One of the primary reasons Islamic and Western nations are “worlds apart” is because the way they understand the world is worlds apart. Whereas Muslims see the world through the lens of history, the West has jettisoned or rewritten history to suit its ideologies.
This dichotomy of Muslim and Western thinking is evident everywhere. When the Islamic State declared that it will “conquer Rome” and “break its crosses,” few in the West realized that those are the verbatim words and goals of Islam’s founder and his companions as recorded in Muslim sources—words and goals that prompted over a thousand years of jihad on Europe.
Most recently, the Islamic State released a map of the areas it plans on expanding into over the next five years. The map includes European nations such as Portugal, Spain, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Greece, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Romania, Armenia, Georgia, Crete, Cyprus, and parts of Russia.
The reason these European nations are included in the Islamic State’s map is simple. According to Islamic law, once a country has been conquered (or “opened,” as it’s called in the euphemistic Arabic), it becomes Islamic in perpetuity.
This, incidentally, is the real reason Muslims despise Israel. It’s not due to sympathy for the Palestinians—if so, neighboring Arab nations would’ve absorbed them long ago (just as they would be absorbing all of today’s Muslim refugees).
No, Israel is hated because the descendants of “apes and pigs”—to use the Koran’s terminology—dare to rule land that was once “opened” by jihad and therefore must be returned to Islam. (Read more about Islam’s “How Dare You?!” phenomenon to understand the source of Islamic rage, especially toward Israel.)
All the aforementioned European nations are also seen as being currently “occupied” by Christian “infidels” and in need of “liberation.” This is why jihadi organizations refer to terrorist attacks on such countries as “defensive jihads.”
One rarely heard about Islamic designs on European nations because they are large and blocked together, altogether distant from the Muslim world. Conversely, tiny Israel is right in the heart of the Islamic world—hence why most jihadi aspirations were traditionally geared toward the Jewish state: it was more of a realistic conquest.
Now, however, that the “caliphate” has been reborn and is expanding before a paralytic West, dreams of reconquering portions of Europe—if not through jihad, then through migration—are becoming more plausible, perhaps even more so than conquering Israel.
Because of their historical experiences with Islam, some central and east European nations are aware of Muslim aspirations. Hungary’s prime minister even cited his nation’s unpleasant past under Islamic rule (in the guise of the Ottoman Empire) as reason to disallow Muslim refugees from entering.
But for more “enlightened” Western nations—that is, for idealistic nations that reject or rewrite history according to their subjective fantasies—Hungary’s reasoning is unjust, unhumanitarian, and racist.
To be sure, most of Europe has experience with Islamic depredations. As late as the seventeenth century, even distant Iceland was being invaded by Muslim slave traders. Roughly 800 years earlier, in 846, Rome was sacked and the Vatican defiled by Muslim raiders.
Some of the Muslims migrating to Italy vow to do the same today, and Pope Francis acknowledges it. Yet, all the same, he suggests that “you can take precautions, and put these people to work.” (We’ve seen this sort of thinking before: the U.S. State Department cites a lack of “job opportunities” as reason for the existence of the Islamic State).
Perhaps because the U.K., Scandinavia, and North America were never conquered and occupied by the sword of Islam—unlike those southeast European nations that are resisting Muslim refugees—they feel free to rewrite history according to their subjective ideals, specifically, that historic Christianity is bad and all other religions and people are good (the darker and/or more foreign the better).
Indeed, countless are the books and courses on the “sins” of Christian Europe, from the Crusades to colonialism. (Most recently, a book traces the rise of Islamic supremacism in Egypt to the disciplining of a rude Muslim girl by a European nun.)
This “new history”—particularly that Muslims are the historic “victims” of “intolerant” Western Christians—has metastasized everywhere, from high school to college and from Hollywood to the news media (which are becoming increasingly harder to distinguish from one another).
When U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama condemned medieval Christians as a way to relativize Islamic State atrocities—or at best to claim that religion, any religion, is never the driving force of violence—he was merely being representative of the mainstream way history is taught in the West.
Even otherwise sound books of history contribute to this distorted thinking. While such works may mention “Ottoman expansion” into Europe, the Islamic element is omitted. Thus Turks are portrayed as just another competitive people, out to carve a niche for themselves in Europe, no differently than rival Christian empires. That the “Ottomans” (or “Saracens,” or “Arabs,” or “Moors,” or “Tatars”) were operating under the distinctly Islamic banner of jihad—just like the Islamic State is today—that connection is never made.
Generations of pseudo history have led the West to think that, far from being suspicious or judgmental of them, Muslims must be accommodated—say, by allowing them to migrate into the West in mass. Perhaps then they’ll “like us”?
Such is progressive wisdom.
Meanwhile, back in the school rooms of much of the Muslim world, children continue to be indoctrinated in glorifying and reminiscing over the jihadi conquests of yore—conquests by the sword and in the name of Allah. While the progressive West demonizes European/Christian history—when I was in elementary school, Christopher Columbus was a hero, when I got into college, he became a villain—Mehmet the Conqueror, whose atrocities against Christian Europeans make the Islamic State look like a bunch of boy scouts, is praised every year in “secular” Turkey on the anniversary of the savage sack Constantinople.
The result of Western fantasies and Islamic history is that Muslims are now entering the West, unfettered, in the guise of refugees who refuse to assimilate with the “infidels” and who form enclaves, or in Islamic terminology, ribats—frontier posts where the jihad is waged on the infidel, one way or the other.
Nor is this mere conjecture. The Islamic State is intentionally driving the refugee phenomenon and has promised to send half a million people—mostly Muslim—into Europe. It claims that 4,000 of these refugees are its own operatives: “Just wait…. It’s our dream that there should be a caliphate not only in Syria but in all the world, and we will have it soon, inshallah [Allah willing].”
It is often said that those who ignore history are destined to repeat it. What does one say of those who rewrite history in a way that demonizes their ancestors while whitewashing the crimes of their forebears’ enemies?
The result is before us. History is not repeating itself; sword waving Muslims are not militarily conquering Europe. Rather, they are being allowed to walk right in.
Perhaps a new aphorism needs to be coined for our times: Those who forget or ignore history are destined to be conquered by those who remember and praise it.
It’s time for more Christian CRUSADERS!!
So, I say this ONWARD CHRISTIAN AND JEWISH SOLDIERS MARCHING AS TO WAR WITH YHWH-YAHWEH AND YESHUA-JESUS CHRIST FOREVERMORE!!
Because of the HEBREW TEXTS ( SCROLLS ) we have Judaism and Christianity!! Only Judaism and Christianity is RIGHT as we have the same GOD who art in HEAVEN ABOVE!!
Please PRAY for our Judeo-Christian Nation United States of America and Israel-Yisrael Everyday Everyone!!
United We Stand with Israel-Yisrael and our Judeo-Christian Nation United States of America, DIVIDED WE FALL!!
Am Yisrael Chai Forevermore Israel-Yisrael!!
Love Always and Shalom Everyone,
Kristi
However, the conversion of Paul on the road to Damascus proves that Jews also need to be “born again” and accept Jesus Christ as savior.
Except that Psaul remained an evil sicarii assassin for Rome, and only pretended to have seen “an angel of light” to corrupt Christianity! Jews have always had the Covenant with G*d, ever since Mt. Sinai! Or do you think G*d breaks and re-writes his Covenants whenever it suits him?! Like “allah” does?! Psaul was a proto-Muhammad who advised we all Submit to slavery!
And what are you? A liar? The Old Covenant is fulfilled, therefore it no longer exists. The New Covenant is now in place, the one that the Old Covenant foretold, and in this new order Jews are no longer the chosen ones, they are like everyone else. They can only obtain their entrance into the Kingdom of God by accepting his Son.
Israel only existed to bring about the birth of Jesus Christ, who is humanity’s only salvation. And God has made it very clear that he is not done with Israel, because he promised to restore Israel, and has done so, but only for his purposes, not for the Jews sake, for the world’s sake, because it is through this tiny piece of land that God will once more reveal himself to mankind, without any doubt.
When some early Christians claimed that the Jews had no advantage, the apostle Paul disagreed with them. “What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision? Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God” (Rom.3:1-2).
Paul, in another place, speaks of the “Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises; Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever” (Rom.9:4-5).
Speaking of the Jewish people, Paul states, “For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge. For they being ignorant of God’s righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God” (Romans 10:2-3).
He credits the Jew for having a great zeal of God and for working hard to establish their own righteousness. Is this not true of the faithful Jew? He works very hard to live righteously. His zeal is seen in the care with which he obeys the traditions of the fathers.
So, of what does Paul say the Jew is ignorant? He is ignorant of God’s righteousness. How can that be? A Jew certainly understands the greatness of God’s righteousness. His ignorance must be of something about God’s righteousness. But what?
The Bible teaches that a man cannot earn his own salvation–and not just in the New Testament. Ecclesiastes
7:20 teaches: “For there is not a just man upon the earth, that doeth good, and sinneth not.” Solomon said, “for there is no man that sinneth not” (I Kings 8:46).
Therefore, no man can achieve perfect righteousness. As a result, all men including Jews are under a curse.
Deuteronomy 27:26, after the giving of the law, states, “Cursed be he that confirmeth not all the words of this law to do them. And all the people shall say, Amen.” Notice, the man who does not do all the words of this law is said to be cursed. Yet, all men fail in the law at some point. David said of
mankind, “They are all gone aside, they are all together become filthy:
there is none that doeth good, no, not one” (Psalm 14:3).
Paul taught that, “blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the the Gentiles be come in” (Romans 11:25).
“God forbid…God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew” (Romans 11:1-2). He goes on to tell how that Elijah thought that he was the only one who had remained faithful to God. Yet God reminded him that there were still seven thousand men who had not bowed the knee to the image of Baal. Paul then concludes, “Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace” (Romans 11:5). There always have been and always will be Jews who recognize Jesus as their true Messiah.
Paul declared, “Brethren, my heart’s desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved” (Romans 10:1). He further testified, “I have great heaviness and continual sorrow in my heart. For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh” (Romans 9:2-3). Paul knew that each individual must accept or reject Jesus Christ on their own. However, he loved his people so much that he would have been willing to give up his place in heaven if it would have meant their salvation.
28: For he is not a real Jew who is one outwardly, nor is
true circumcision something external and physical. 29: He is a Jew who is one inwardly, and real circumcision is a matter of the heart, spiritual and not literal. His praise is not from men but from God. (Romans 2:28)
Paul did not speak badly about the Jews, in fact he was willing to lay down his life them. So you are merely a victim of false propaganda.
No, not me! I can simply answer C.S Lewis’ famous question: Jesus was the first two, not the last!
😉
Christianity is simply WRONG, because Jesus promised an entirely pain-and-fear-free Heaven, which is simply impossible.
Both this world AND the continuing, infinite extensions of it currently mis-represented as the “AFTER” life, can only offer more Pain, fear of that pain, greed (universal objective hope still limited by fear of pain) and hope (of less or no pain). Repeat endlessly! Immortality bites.
Without these, there is no consciousness, so an entirely pain- and-fear-free afterlife is an impossibility. Kinda depressing.
you idiot,this earth isn’t heaven. who the heck do you think you are to say it Impossible when you don’t even understand or believe Spiritual Principles. heaven exist already. so does the Earth,so does hell,Hell is full of People who reject Jesus,and teach against the truth of the Bible
What are your so-called “Spiritual Principles”? I bet if you laid them all out and examined them, you’d find they are utter nonsense.
Jesus said to His disciples that they ,who found it hard to understand Earthly things would not be able to comprehend Heavenly things. He explained it as something beyond the greatest treasure and beyond the greatest yearning of the Human soul. At the end of the age God will create a new heaven and a new Earth. Earth will once more take it’s place in the heavenly realm.Death and Hell will be destroyed because there will be no more need for either..
Exactly, thanks! Utter nonsense!
There is no real difference between ‘heaven’ and ‘earth’ – they are all based on logical science and so can be understood by rationality. The only one who says otherwise is the devil.
Any real god would be able – and willing – to explain to his creations that which they do not know, so he wouldn’t have to forgive them for what they do without knowing!
😉
You have missed the point completely.We cannot understand what is beyond our ability to comprehend or even imagine. Could you explain fully a beautiful sunset to a person blind from birth ? No. Such a person ,sadly,can have no concept of what it is ,no knowledge of colour for a start,or the subtle emotional effects such an occurrence has.This is because one has to experience it and comprehend it to enjoy it and feel it.
Yes. But colour and taste are the only mysteries left LOL!
Are you drunk?
Are you an idolater?
You are drunk ,aren’t you.
no,your wrong,the Covenant with Israel was Eternal. yes,they still need to come into Living Faith is Yeshua but God has already spoken of this,and will Fulfill it..Israel was not only Crated for Jesus to come,The Plan of God is for the 12 Tribes to Rule under Yeshua,which will include also the believers Both Jews and Gentiles throughout the last 2 000 Years.your confusing different Covenants here,There is the Abrahamic Covenant which is mainly to do with the Land,Was that eternal? YES It was!
Yes the covenant is eternal in Christ,those who follow Christ follow the law. He,Christ, is the law,that which reconciles mankind to God and allows mankind to be acceptable to God.
12,000 from each of the 12 tribes of the Hebrew of which 10 tribes were taken captive and then scattered around the world equals the 144,000 of His elect in the end times.
” 28: For he is not a real Jew who is one outwardly, nor is
true
circumcision something external and physical. 29: He is a Jew who is one
inwardly, and real circumcision is a matter of the heart, spiritual and
not literal. His praise is not from men but from God. (Romans 2:28)” the Jews still exist and soon they will come back to the fold.Read every part of the Bible,Romans 11 clearly speak of Israel’s Ultimate redemption ,why do you think God has Restored them to their own land ? why do you not see Zechariah 12 coming to pass before our eyes? Zech 12: 10 14 states clearly that When the Nations Invade Jerusalem,God will pour Out his Spirit on them,Zechariah 14 confirms this,so does Act 1:6 to 10…Jews are still Jews,it just that Paul was saying in other words,a Saved Jew is that which is born of the Spirit..no gentle can call himself a Jew.we are not,a real Jew is a Jew who is born again. but Unbelieving Jews are still Jews.
Rather well said, Ranger. Jesus was a Jew, and Jesus taught that Jesus is the Christ. So: One can teach that Jesus is the Christ and still be a Jew.
Your citing from new testament writers who transcribed the original Hebrew Bible to their liking and for their own convenience (to collect money). For example, “On THE first day, on THE second day, on THE third day….” was actually “on A second day, on A third day…” which rather proves evolution, doesn’t it?
Jesus said learn the parable of the fig tree.
Excellently put.I would add that Christ ,as you say,fulfilled the law,not to abolish it but to accomplish it’s purpose. The old covenant is incorporated into the new by and in Jesus.If one follows Jesus one follows the law in it’s entirety because He is the law in it’s fulfillment,ie to reconcile man to God.
You loon. You sound just like the Muslims, with “God” or “YHWH” substituted for “Allah”. They, too, read their book which calls for war leading to eventually universal peace (once they’ve conquered the world). Your call for a Crusade is PRECISELY what Muslims fear and fight now.
As long as people are fighting in the name of ANY religion, there will only be war. Abandoning these invisible sky-friends, or at least not taking them seriously, is necessary for real peace. It will be a long struggle to achieve this rationality.
Why?. Do you think human nature will change in some way? It won’t ,it never has. Take away the restraining power of the Holy Spirit from mankind and all hell will break loose. None of us have ever lived in a world where the God of the Bible does not influence the actions of men,where absolute morality rules. Even those who behave badly know their actions are bad because there is an absolute morality external to man. People cry out for fairness and justice,based on what? Your justice ,my justice,someone else’s justice? The Gospels do not call for war,but they do not forbid fighting evil and wickedness ,such a fight is often necessary. If Muslims fear a “crusade” why do they persecute the followers of Christ.They persecute the Jews and any faith different to their own. They fight each other over political differences,which sect is rightly guided and which isn’t ,who are apostates and who is a hypocrite. Allah is not God . Evil can only produce what is evil.
“Allah is not God” — yes, just as a dragon is not a centaur, and they’re all non-existent.
It’s an opinion,and one you are entitled to ,in a Christian world. Woe betide you if Islam ever becomes dominant;I sense you’re the type who would suddenly find an all powerful belief in Allah.
Your opinion is just that,an opinion. unless you understand all the mysteries of existence ,known and unknown,you cannot make such a bold statement. There is more evidence for the existence of God than for His non existence. At the moment you have a very child like view of God;what is all this juvenile “sky friend” nonsense? If this is the depth of your understanding no wonder you are an atheist.
You “sense”. That sounds about right. Since actual evidence is irrelevant to a theist, your emotions are all you have to go by and you can make up anything that feels right to you. And you couldn’t be more wrong about my “type”, whatever that means. I understand that I’d be among the first to die under Islam (unless I converted, of course). At least Christianity’s batshit crazy era ended with the last witch burnings, thus I can live alongside them much more easily.
Your understanding of Christianity is appalling.
Did you ever read Christianity or any of the many commentaries on it? When ever anyone opines that Christianity is “crazy” it is a good clue that that person hasn’t read about it in any depth or understood it.
Thank you, Mr. Ibrahim
Well said. Excellent article.
I am hungarian and i know what muslims did in my country. .It was horror
They “collected” 5 million Christian children and youngsters for the devshirme. Not to speak about the girls and the women, and, separately, about enslavement.
http://search.proquest.com/openview/3ea9bd50ec421060307f42e930408fbd/1?pq-origsite=gscholar
Batak Massacre, Bulgaria
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batak_massacre
Siege of Eger, Hungary
http://www.eurotrib.com/story/2008/10/18/182849/03
very good. KEEP FIGHTING. Dont give up!
Clear, concise and sane: you’ll never make it in this town, Bud!
True, true-that’s the kiss of death my friend!
Stll: We will do this God willing. Our men will fight and we will help them, in every way possible. Because only WE have His help.
Well, until last year many used to say “poverty and lack of access to oil” drives Nigeria’s Boko Haram:
http://newint.org/features/web-exclusive/2014/11/06/insight-into-boko-haram/
But Boko’s leader knows his Quranic lesson better: “What we are doing is an order from Allah, and all that we are doing is in the Book of Allah that we follow ” – i.e., the Quran.
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/boko-haram-kidnappers-slave-owners-terrorists-killers/story?id=23598347
“Perhaps a new aphorism needs to be coined for our times: Those who
forget or ignore history are destined to be conquered by those who
remember and praise it.” PERFECT! Well said!
A very well articulated article. The only problem is you have used very clear and concise logic based on historical fact! Which are tools no politician or social democrat is capable of understanding ….
No problem was ever best solved by ignoring it, or by covering it up so nobody else would see that it exists, either.
In the 1960s, being a ‘free spirit’ was actually a set up for being a socialist/communist because it implied subjectivism.
That is, the belief that ‘there are no values. Everything is a matter of opinion. So let’s have fun without giving a damn.’
With subjectivism in place, multiculturalism (‘Western culture with it traditions of freedom and individual rights is not vastly morally superior to decadent European socialism and the primitive savage belief systems of third world countries, particularly Islam.’) and political correctness (“Since if anyone speaks their mind, they may hurt someone else’s feelings, so the government must regulate, or abolish entirely, freedom of speech.’) both came right long behind.
Everything criminals do, is to avoid being seen as “wrong!”
But the only way to never do a wrong thing, is to never do anything!
So they must make up excuses to never do anything! Excuses are not reasons, which depend on cause-and-effect, so the first excuse they make is that there is no cause-and-effect!
That way, they get to pretend they are always the victims, BY blaming their own victims!
SUCH IS CRIMINALLY-NEGLIGENT, DELINQUENT LIBERTINE “LIBERALISM!”
What sane people call “The Slippery Slope,” criminals call “Progress!”
;-(
Intressting !!!!! From This is Christian Syria 2 har lagt till 2 nya foton.
den 1 oktober kl. 19:08 ·
2014 : a terrorist belongs to isis
2015 : a poor refugee in Germany
This is terrifying Violetta, may G-d save us from ISLAM.
God doesnt help in this case because God havent religion..
Maybe we need Putin in the EU!
This is why we have to be careful who get in our counties!!
This is why we have to be careful who we let in our county!!
“The result is before us. History is not repeating itself; sword waving Muslims are not militarily conquering Europe. Rather, they are being allowed to walk right in.
Perhaps a new aphorism needs to be coined for our times: Those who forget or ignore history are destined to be conquered by those who remember and praise it.”
You’ve nailed it, mr. Ibrahim.
This horrible situation really is a perfect storm. The naiveté of the general public (they equate “refugee” with “innocent victim”, and they have been raised with the idea that rebels, revolutionaries and “freedom fighters” are always “on the right side of history”) combines with a deep antipathy towards Christianity (a religion that a lot of present-day Europeans actually know very little about) and a very negative view of the European past (which is often not even based on facts at all – just ask any medievist about the public perception of the Middle Ages).
The result is the situation that is unfolding today. A good chunk of the general public is insisting that every refugee should be let in, on the presumption that they can only have good intentions anyway. And the left is insisting that they should be let in because they insist that Europe shouldn’t be ‘white’ or Christian anymore.
Then there’s the horrid mentality that equates “Christian” with “evil white European oppressor” and “Muslim” with “quintessential victim of Western aggression and colonialism”. The realities that the overwhelming majority of Christians live outside the West (especially in Latin America and Africa) and that Muslims are doing plenty of oppressing as well (such as the fate of religious minorities in the Middle-East, the fate of guest workers in the Gulf, and Arab racism against blacks in Africa and Arabia) are simply lost on them.
Meanwhile, previous waves of Muslim immigration have resulted in European Muslim communities that are so hostile and maladjusted that even more moderate Muslim immigrants are saying that it’s alarming.
And of course, any and all criticism from ‘white’ Europeans gets pigeonholed as ‘xenophobia’, or more popularly, ‘islamophobia’. Even Muslim and ex-Muslim critics are dismissed and slandered. People like Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Ibn Warraq are outright called ‘Western supremacists’ and are basically treated as race traitors.
The EU, British and American leaders are neither ignorant or naive about Islam. They hate Jews and Christians as much as Muslims hate us. Western leaders are possessed with an all-consuming hate for the HOLY ONE, Almighty God, our Magnificent, Glorious Creator. Their intense hate for God is the reason Western leaders collaborate with top Muslim leaders and criminally overpopulated and colonised our small nations of Europe and tiny Britain with 52 million Muslims.
Wicked EU leader Angela Merkel recently invited millions of Muslims to invade Europe. The EU, UN and US spit on our Golden Rule and seek to utterly annihilate our merciful Western civilisation and bring about a terrible Holocaust, a huge genocide of the Jews and Christians of Europe and Britain.
Well written article!
I am Indian, and my own countrymen only have a romantic notion of what took place 800 years ago when Islam descended on India.
They would rather complain about the atrocities of the British, now that they are no longer there. That is the only thing that unites the Muslims with the Hindus.
I guess Hitler wasn’t that bad then,but we got rid of Him and his mob.,I guess we have to do the same here?
Hitler tried to destroy the Jews. To bad he did not turn his hatred to the muslems. Think about it millions less muslems that would not of spawned millions more of the goat lovers.
Just a question. I am a Christian and I am also white,but my husband is black. When I read so many articles, skin color is brought up often. As above, it says the darker and or more foriegn the better. That’s wrong. Shouldn’t we be only talking here about the deception of our own country and the deception of Islam?
Conflicts between Muslims and Europeans are inevitable. Many Britains, for one, are essentially fed up with everything Islamic and are already wanting to fight back. Things will inevitably escalate and leave Europe looking like Syria. I don’t see invading hordes of Islamic adherents having an easy time of it, not once their would be victims make up their minds to fight back.
if I would suggest “nuke *em!” there would come the usual outcry:
“inciting blabla … blabla hatred… ” and so on.
but in the end the west will have no other choice.
and we are just a few years away from such a situation, thanks obama*s great deal.
it could be anytime, pakistans nuclear arsenal and fragile political situation considered
Time to use that muslem scum obama as a dumb bomb to send to his muslem brothers and sisters/goats. Cover him in pigs blood and strap him to a bunker buster to be dropped on isis.
Do not forget hillary, strap her to another bunker buster, cover her in pigs blood with the message
( how to make a muslem into a good muslem )
There is little to worry about. These muslims are inept fighters, they are un-organized and they are making as many enemies among their muslims brothers as among anyone else. You just need to keep them out of your country. I am American and soon, hopefully, we will be electing a man who will do just that, Donal J. Trump.
perhaps we just need to exterminate a violent cult called islam before it starts wwIII
What crap !
It also has to do with Abraham – that he cast out Ishmael and his mother (a handmaid) when Sarah (his wife) bore Isaac. God blessed the Abramic line to become Israel, the Jews, and Ishmael was cursed to become a warlike people. Muslims have never gotten over that, even though they credit Abraham with their genesis.