In certain respects, the real struggle between Islam and the West has less to do with an inherently weak Islam and more to do with subversive Western elements that cover up for and empower Muhammad’s creed.
Out-and-out censorship is one of these tactics. In a January 10 email titled, “We’re Suing Google – Here’s Why,” Prager University, which produces short videos on subjects “important to understanding American values,” explained that “YouTube has chosen repeatedly to restrict some of our videos for violating their ‘Community Guidelines.’ Those guidelines are meant to protect users against viewing sexual content, violent or graphic content, and hate speech,” even though “our videos contain nothing even remotely close to any of these categories.”
Prager U had “filed a complaint with YouTube, hoping that there was some kind of innocent mistake. That’s when we were told by YouTube that after reviewing our videos, they determined that they were, indeed, ‘not appropriate for a younger audience.’” Accordingly, several Prager U videos do not appear on YouTube accounts that block sexual or graphic content. (For more on this matter and/or to sign Prager U’s petition against YouTube’s decision, click here.)
To appreciate just how much YouTube’s decision is based on preventing Americans (especially its youth, its future) from understanding the threats Islam poses—and thereby empowering Islam vis-à-vis America—consider the videos I made for Prager U, which are among those currently being restricted by YouTube.
The first is called “Radical Islam: The Most Dangerous Ideology.” Although in it I distinguished between “radical” Muslims and those many Muslims in name only; although I (very conservatively) suggested that perhaps ten percent of the world’s Muslims are “Islamists,” and of those, only two percent are willing to take violent action to enforce their supremacist worldview; and although I said “Islamists have killed far more Muslims than members of any other group”—YouTube deemed that video “inappropriate” for younger audiences.
My other Prager U video, titled “The World’s Most Persecuted Minority: Christians,” is dedicated to shedding light on the plight of Christians, specifically in Muslim lands, where the overwhelming majority of persecution takes place. It too is censored. In other words, shedding light on what many Western authorities have referred to as a “genocide” of Christians, is, for YouTube, as “inappropriate” for youth as sexual, graphic, or hate filled videos. Needless to say, not only are there no real images in the video (sexual, graphic or otherwise), but I attribute the violence against Christians to “fundamentalists” and “fundamentalist interpretations” of the Koran, meaning there’s no “hate” either.
Meanwhile, “other videos on similar topics, but from a liberal perspective”— including those dealing with the alleged or real mistreatment of Muslims at the hands of non-Muslims (which fits the narrative well)—are not restricted by YouTube.
When both my Prager U videos came out, they each quickly reached over one million views. Once YouTube restricted them, their views dropped accordingly—meaning mission (keeping America’s youth in the dark about Islam) achieved.
This, of course, is one of many personal and impersonal examples of YouTube’s cover up efforts. Back on April 22, 2015, I came across a short Islamic State video that was only available on Arabic websites at the time. In it, IS members were videotaped destroying crosses inside and atop churches, while Koran verses against “polytheism” were recited in the background. I decided to upload it on YouTube—to show the people of the West what the people of the Muslim world were privy to. YouTube promptly took the video down.
By the perverse logic of YouTube, it is not the Islamic State that is engaging in hate by destroying churches and crucifixes, but rather me—for simply exposing it. This episode recently came to mind when President Trump retweeted (from an account since suspended) an image of an IS member holding a Virgin Mary statue (which he later smashed). If that rather innocuous image went viral, consider if Trump and/or others had seen and/or drawn attention to the much more graphic video and images of IS members destroying numerous crosses and desecrating churches? Thanks to YouTube censorship, this possibility was not allowed.
The people of the West need to wake up to the fact that they are involved in a war on two fronts: one with an alien civilization that wishes to subjugate or slaughter them, and another with smiley-faced, homegrown elements that go to great lengths to keep this ugly truth hid.
While Roger Stone and Mil’s lawsuit challenges Twitter, I have suggested that it should include FB, Goog and Youtube. They are all guilty as sin of censoring comments regarding islam and muslims. If you collectively add all the comments people care to share-it gives a good picture of Americans views on the subject of creeping sharia. Our politicians will not be allowed to follow the examples of Europe.
“WE’RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT…..NEVER DID AND NEVER WILL”
Raymond you are right but it is not easy to teach people. They sometimes do not want to see the truth or show no interest.
Youtube is the enemy
ALSO, EQUALLY SHARE THE GUILT, BUT YOUTUBE CAN SHOW THE DESIGN OF THE NEXT BOMB FOR THE JIHADISTS, SO THEY CAN BE ILLITERATE, AND STILL BUILD BOMBS,
That does not defy community standards, put same post under a different user name, someone clearly not progressive and see just how fast that youtube disappears.
i am aware of at least 3 lawsuits, not all on same grounds. i “know” the people who are bringing these lawsuits,
i do. but, how can they win in a game that is RIGGED?
The subversive left (is there any other kind) and the Islamists, have an unwritten alliance. Why not, they both share the love of totalitarianism and fascism.
This should come as no surprise as Google and YouTube are part of the MSM cultural Marxist atheistic anti-Judao-Christian ideology.
They have made themselves indispensable in this day and age and we have bought into it.
It has become like living in a world of fairy tales, pretty pictures and nicey nicey left wing idiots who are generally under educated in many subjects and in particular Islam. Many ex Muslims are speaking out, maybe these ex muslims could form a high profile series of video’s educating the idiots of the left. We live in dystopia as for Utopia this is a pipe dream, humanity is currently incapable of evolving any higher than the reptilian part of the brain, Gorillas have more empathy and altruism.
Apropos Raymond’s article – it’s good to see people are reacting; https://www.christianpost.com/news/people-outraged-as-google-home-identifies-buddha-muhammad-and-satan-but-not-jesus-christ-215135/?utm_source=newsletter
They’re creating the “safe spaces” that protect America’s youthful students from content that might upset their tender sensibilities. For these “Americans” Muslims are the “victims” of the much detested, white, priviieged, right wing, conservative “meanies” that lurk in every dark, prejudiced, creepy crawly corner of the planet spittle spewing their hateful, racist message. They must be stopped. And so it goes.
The major concern here is how many of those who regularly visit these social media websites, posing as staunch champions of free speech, are aware that the exact opposite is true.
Surprised by YouTube censoring? Don’t you wonder what else is found to be “inappropriate”
for one audience or another? Fix? Don’t use YouTube.
Would be overwhelmed if 50% at minimum of FB members were to quit.
Boycott? Markz is DNA offshoot of Soros. I have never been a member and over my dead body would i join, albeit there are certain sites i do not get. cannot, get an email and tells me to go to FB site, even the good guys,.
IT IS HIDEOUS,
My cousin blocked someone and they reported her, and now FB BLOCKED HER, AND WANTS HER TO PROVE HER REAL NAME IS REAL, OMG,
SURREAL. A SURREAL WORLD, SO WHAT IF HER NAME is a bit fanciful, not unusual but pleasant, IT IS REAL. MIDDLE AND LAST NAMES ARE FROM OUR MUTUAL GRANDPARENTS.
Of course she is conservative, what else?
Need protest around GATE of markz’s house, with the huge GATE, AKIN TO OSHIT’S GATE, ALL OF WHOM ARE, OF COURSE, AGAINST THE FENCE . FENCES ARE ONLY FOR PROGRESSIVES.
Why do those with brains not quit FB. delete acct (of course it is always there someplace just like killery’s emails that were bit bleached, they are all retrievable,
something like 95% of younguns are on FB. SHUT THEM DOWN, ALONG WITH TWITTER AND THE REST OF THE VILE SITES.
I HAVE 2 MILLENIALS, IT IS HORRIFIC.
SORRY, TOO LONG,
It’s servitude to the wild beast. Bowing down, behind the censorship of the truth, to the “father of lies.” and his beast of islam and calling it ‘protection’ of the young.
Creeping “Submission” under flimsy veil of community guideline restriction?
In sync with broader sinister trend, Google’s widening free-speech restrictions, disguised as “Community Guidelines” (separate from legitimate protections), does not only affect the young. Some of us DO NOT WANT to sign in to Nanny Google. (Via Utah’s $1.5 Billion NSA “Bumblehive” facility?) So, adults too, along with the young, are left out in the dark (if not as blinded): No access to view videos behind the lengthening Iron Curtain of censorship! — Like mercury, freedoms are inexorably slipping away.
http://www.dcclothesline.com/2018/01/28/the-urgent-case-for-anti-trust-legislation-against-facebook-google/