On Friday, March 28, in Ain Shams, a suburb of Cairo, rioting Muslim Brotherhood supporters attacked the Virgin Mary and Archangel Michael Coptic Orthodox Church, including by opening fire on it and setting parked cars aflame. Four people died.
One of the slain, a young Coptic woman, was savagely mauled and molested before being murdered—simply because her cross identified her as a Christian to the Brotherhood rioters.
According to an eyewitness who discussed the entire event on the Egyptian program, 90 Minutes, Mary Sameh George was parking by the church to deliver medicine to a sickly, elderly woman:
Once they saw that she was a Christian [because of the cross hanging on her rear view mirror], they jumped on top of the car, to the point that the vehicle was no longer visible. The roof of the car collapsed in. When they realized that she was starting to die, they pulled her out of the car and started pounding on her and pulling her hair—to the point that portions of her hair and scalp came off. They kept beating her, kicking her, stabbing her with any object or weapon they could find…. Throughout [her ordeal] she tried to protect her face, giving her back to the attackers, till one of them came and stabbed her right in the back, near the heart, finishing her off. Then another came and grabbed her by the hair, shaking her head, and with the other hand slit her throat. Another pulled her pants off, to the point that she was totally naked.
The eyewitness, as well as many others who have since appeared on videos, complained about Egyptian State Security and how it did not intervene—just like under Morsi, when St. Mark Cathedral was besieged, even as security stood by—how it knows exactly who the murderers are, and how one of Mary’s murderers, whom “everyone reported to Security,” was simply relaxing in his home, not even hiding.
Added the eyewitness: “Let me tell you, here in Ain Shams, we [Christians] know that every Friday is a day of death; that the day after Friday, Saturday, we’ll be carried to the morgue!”
In fact, the overwhelming majority of attacks on Egypt’s Christians occur on Friday—the day when pious Muslims meet in mosque for prayers and to hear sermons.
The significance of this fact can only be understood by analogy: what if Christians were especially violent to non-Christian minorities on Sunday—right after they got out of church? What would that say about what goes on in Christian churches?
What does it say about what goes on in Muslim mosques?
A video of Mary’s family members has one woman screaming out the following words—which may be of interest to some Americans:
A message to [U.S. President Barack] Obama, who is calling for the Brotherhood to return to power again. I want to tell him, have mercy, enough is enough! His brother is in the al-Qaeda organization! Why do you want to destroy Egypt?…. Egypt will remain whether you, the Brotherhood, or anyone else likes it or not!
She was referring to something that is as well known in Egypt as it is little known in the United States: that the Obama administration is a sponsor of the Muslim Brotherhood, which itself is connected to al-Qaeda.
The rest of the video portrays some of Mary’s other family members—many in tears and near hysteria—prompting one to wonder: where is the U.S media? I have not seen a word on this latest Islamic attack on a church and Christians on BBC, CNN, or any of the so-called “mainstream media”? Why is that? They had no problem constantly showing us (over and over again) a video clip of a hysterical female relative of a member of Malaysian flight MH370.
The mainstream media is silent because Muslim persecution of Christians in general—Obama-sponsored Muslim Brotherhood in particular—throws a huge wrench in their narrative.
After all, how many Americans ever heard of the largest massacre of Syrian Christians by U.S.-supported Islamic rebels?
Responding to this latest murder of a Christian, Coptic Bishop Raphaeil wrote:
Oh how lucky you are, Mary, you who are beloved of Christ. They tore your body because of the Cross. Yet they offered you the greatest service and gave you a name of honor as one who has attained the crown of martyrdom.
More poignantly, the bishop quoted Christ in the Bible, “Yes, the time is coming that whoever kills you will think that he offers God service” (John 16:2)—a reference to the fact that the Muslims slaughtering the followers of Christ all around the world quite often believe they are doing God’s (or Allah’s) work.
Hence why anecdotes such as Friday’s are becoming immensely regular in the Muslim world. Indeed, only a few months ago, two other Coptic Christian girls — both also named “Mary” — were slain when Brotherhood supporters opened fire on yet another church.
Such is the dramatic, eye-opening, and medieval world outside U.S. borders that the “powers that be” do not want you to know about—for only their well-crafted, self-serving narratives must prevail.
Mikasi says
Obama’s Egypt. Obama’s Libya. Obama’s Syria. Obama’s Iran. Obama’s deliberate losing of Iraq. Obama’s Afghan failure. Obama’s ROE that gets soldiers killed. Not a coincidence from the muzzie.
sylva portoian says
Why Obama …who entered Iraq and Afghanistan was bush and not Obama…
Mikasi says
Don’t be a bigger idiot than you have to be.
Mikasi says
Don’t you realize that there is a massacre going on and Obama says nothing? Remember the Armenians? Who do you think is Ergodan’s friend? Turkey is going backwards. Iraq. Won. But Obama pulled out all the support troops and look at what is happening. Afghanistan. Rules of Engagement are getting our soldiers killed and where will that end? Don’t give me Obama crap. He supports the muslim brotherhood and the Egyptians know it. Wonder why Ukraine is afraid of Russia. There history. Holodomor. Look it up.
Mikasi says
And surely you remember 9/11/01? Bin Laden was in Afghanistan. Catch up.
dia61 says
Yes, Turkey is going backwards. I lived there. I loved it. It was my home. I won’t go back.
The primaries were yesterday and Erdogan’s AK Party won another victory. The founder of the Turkish Republic (1923), Mustafa Kemal, was a rabid anti-Islamist and Turkey was proudly secular until 2003. Make no mistake, “green” money from the Gulf has been pouring in to Turkey for years. There is also something called the Hizmet Movement, ( the leader , Gulen, lives in the Poconos) and his followers are hell bound and determined to rebuild a worldwide Turkish Caliphate.
Turkey is polarized. The secularists are losing their voices. Turkey is suffering because of it.
Don’t be too hard on the “sylvia portoian” ( I have never read any of her previous posts, ‘cuz I’m a “newbie”). But, Bush was far from being an angel. I would urge ALL OF YOU to read “The Redirection”, published in the New Yorker magazine, in 2007, by Pultizer Prize winning author, Seymour Hersh. If you do read it, please remember that it was written in 2007. Had I read it in 2007, I would have thought that it was fiction and that Hersh was a conspiracy theorist. Now? It’s,……well,…….read it,……that’s all I can say.
AS far as the IKHWAN murdering Christians? It’s got its stamp of approval from the USA. The Egyptian, Syrian, and Armenian deaths are horrendous examples of what it looks like when you climb in to bed with the devil. Can you EVER picture Ronnie Reagan bowing to a guy wearing a sheet? Look how low WE’VE fallen.
Getting back to my beloved Turkey ( and yes, I am a Christian), I am praying for a miracle. Turkey was a proudly secular country and a founding member of NATO. This Islamist turn did not happen without outside help and it is unbelievably scary. I repeat, this is BIGTIME scary.
Mikasi says
I know. I’m sorry. I know what Turkey was. I’m a history buff. I know about Bush too. He said three days after the attack from atop that burned out fire truck with his arm around a firefighter through a bullhorn….We Are Not At War With Islam. I was horrified. I was a volunteer firefighter at the time. islam is at war with us. It’s always been so and always will be. He still says it. No. No angel. But he did care genuinely about the troops. Obama doesn’t. You don’t fight a war to win hearts and minds. You fight so that an attack won’t happen again. It will. The muslims are brazen in their slaughter of Christians. I wouldn’t have asked you what your faith is. Yes it is big time scary. I hope you don’t have family there.
dia61 says
I’m writing a book to tell the whole story.
It’s a multi generational story which will show how history repeats itself. Yes, I have family there and trust me when I tell you that my heart is there as well. It was such a fabulous country and, if you are in to history, you would have LOVED all of the history that Turkey holds. I’m holding my breath in anticipation of what’s going to happen next. Thank you for your warm support ( and intelligence).
Mikasi says
I’m happy to hear that you are writing a book. I hope you let us know somehow when it comes out. Yes. Turkey is a beautiful country. I pray for your family. The west has been screwing up in the Mideast for decades. Don’t believe democrats though. I read quickly through The Redirection. I’ll read it more carefully. There is merit but also mistakes. Biden talked incessantly about splitting Iraq into three. Hagel is a dhimmi joke who can hardly string three words together. Brennan. Well. Sure speaks good Arab. Also a dhimmi. Frightening. I live in Arizona. Where the Saudi “pilots” trained…..to fly…not to land. The Saudis own Obama. So does the muslim brotherhood. Here most of the mosques are sunni. I know about the guy in the Poconos too.
Larry says
YO MORON!
YOU STUPID MORON!
YOU IGNORANT MORON!
TALMUDIC JUDAISM IS THE OCTOPUS THAT PULLS THE PURSE STRINGS OF THIS WORLD!
WHEN GADDAFI TRIED TO CREATE THE AFRICAN GOLD BASED DOLLAR, HE WAS DEAD MAN WALKING!
Gadhafi’s Gold-money Plan Would Have Devastated Dollar
Alex Newman
It remains unclear exactly why or how the Gadhafi regime went from “a model” and an “important ally” to the next target for regime change in a period of just a few years. But
after claims of “genocide” as the justification for NATO intervention were disputed by experts, several other theories have been floated.
Oil, of course, has been mentioned frequently – Libya is Africa‘s largest oil producer. But one possible reason in particular for Gadhafi’s fall from grace has gained significant traction among analysts and segments of the non-Western media: central banking and the global monetary system.
According to more than a few observers, Gadhafi’s plan to
quit selling Libyan oil in U.S. dollars – demanding payment instead in gold-backed “dinars” (a single African currency made from gold) – was the real cause. The regime, sitting on massive amounts of gold, estimated at close to 150 tons, was also pushing other African and Middle Eastern governments to follow suit.
And it literally had the potential to bring down the dollar
and the world monetary system by extension, according to analysts. French President Nicolas Sarkozy reportedly went so far as to call Libya a “threat” to the financial security of the world. The “Insiders” were apparently panicking over Gadhafi’s plan.
“Any move such as that would certainly not be welcomed by the power elite today, who are responsible for controlling the world’s central banks,” noted financial analyst Anthony Wile, editor of the free market-oriented Daily Bell, in an interview with RT.
“So yes, that would certainly be something that would cause his immediate dismissal and the need for other reasons to be brought forward [for] removing him from power.”
According to Wile, Gadhafi’s plan would have strengthened the whole continent of Africa in the eyes of economists backing sound money – not to mention investors. But it would have been especially devastating for the U.S. economy, the American dollar, and particularly the elite
in charge of the system.
“The central banking Ponzi scheme requires an ever-increasing base of demand and the immediate silencing of those who would threaten its existence,” Wile noted in a piece entitled “Gaddafi Planned Gold Dinar, Now Under Attack” earlier this year. “Perhaps that is what the hurry [was] in removing Gaddafi in particular and those who might have been sympathetic to his monetary idea.”
Investor newsletters and commentaries have been buzzing for months with speculation about the link between
Gadhafi’s gold dinar and the NATO-backed overthrow of the Libyan regime. Conservative analysts pounced on the potential relationship, too.
“In 2009 – in his capacity as head of the African Union – Libya’s Moammar Gadhafi had proposed that the economically crippled continent adopt the ‘Gold Dinar,'” noted Ilana Mercer in an August opinion piece forWorldNetDaily. “I do not know if Col. Gadhafi continued to agitate for ditching the dollar and adopting the Gold Dinar – or if the Agitator from Chicago got wind of Gadhafi’s (uncharacteristic) sanity about things monetary.”
But if Arab and African nations had begun adopting a
gold-backed currency, it would have had major repercussions for debt-laden Western governments that would be far more significant than the purported “democratic” uprisings sweeping the region this year. And
it would have spelled big trouble for the elite who benefit from “freshly counterfeited funny-money,” Mercer pointed out.
“Had Gadhafi sparked a gold-driven monetary revolution, he would have done well for his own people, and for the world at large,” she concluded. “A Gadhafi-driven gold revolution would have, however, imperiled the positions of central bankers and their political and media power-brokers.”
Adding credence to the theory about why Gadhafi had to be overthrown, as The New American reported in March, was the rebels’ odd decision to create a central bank to replace Gadhafi’s state-owned monetary authority. The decision was broadcast to the world in the early weeks of the conflict.
In a statement describing a March 19 meeting, the rebel
council announced, among other things, the creation of a new oil company. And more importantly: “Designation of the Central Bank of Benghazi as a monetary authority competent in monetary policies in Libya and appointment of a Governor to the Central Bank of Libya, with a
temporary headquarters in Benghazi.”
The creation of a new central bank, even more so than the new national oil regime, left analysts scratching their heads. “I have never before heard of a central bank being created in just a matter of weeks out of a popular uprising,” noted Robert Wenzel in an analysis for the Economic Policy Journal. “This suggests we have a bit more than a rag tag bunch of rebels running around and that there are some pretty sophisticated influences,” he added. Wenzel also noted that the uprising looked like a “major oil
and money play, with the true disaffected rebels being used as puppets and cover” while the transfer of control over money and oil supplies takes place.
Other analysts, even in the mainstream press, were equally
shocked. “Is this the first time a revolutionary group has created a central bank while it is still in the midst of fighting the entrenched political power?” wondered CNBC senior editor John Carney. “It certainly seems to indicate how extraordinarily powerful central bankers have become in our era.”
Similar scenarios involving the global monetary system – based on the
U.S. dollar as a global reserve currency, backed by the fact that oil
is traded in American money – have also been associated with other
targets of the U.S. government. Some analysts even say a pattern is
developing.
Iran, for example, is one of the few nations left in the world
with a state-owned central bank. And Iraqi despot Saddam Hussein, once
armed by the U.S. government to make war on Iran, was threatening to
start selling oil in currencies other than the dollar just prior to the
Bush administration’s “regime change” mission.
While most of the establishment press in America has been silent on the
issue of Gadhafi’s gold dinar scheme, in Russia, China, and the global
alternative media, the theory has exploded in popularity. Whether
salvaging central banking and the corrupt global monetary system were
truly among the reasons for Gadhafi’s overthrow, however, may never be
known for certain – at least not publicly.
Charles says
Boy! You do hate the Jews!
Larry says
JEWS MUST LIVE
by Samuel Roth
Chapter IV
JEW-HATRED AS A NATURAL INSTINCT
But what sort of speech is this for a Jew, you are probably
asking yourself, by this time? I can see the question half-glimmering in your eyes. My answer must be steel set in granite. The dew of compassion has entirely dried up in my bowels. I am myself a Jew, I know it. But I am a Jew who has been brought to the point where he so loathes his people that he thinks in terms of their destruction. No, it has not escaped me that the destruction of Israel would mean my own end, too. I would not want to survive in a world without Jews. Yet, by God, I don’t know how I shall ever again contentedly live with
them: I pray for my own effacement as fervently as I pray for theirs. This is a work of terror, and I am trying to make a terribly good job of it. I have taken out the old Jewish carcass to expose it in the sun. I shall rub it till every sore on it shines like a planet of light.
I know how well the Jews have earned the hatred which is in
my heart towards them. I do not doubt that they have earned in equally good measure the hatred which the nations entertained towards them since records of such international courtesies have been made. Anti-Semitism is a natural effect
of a social cause. I cannot understand why such a deep mystery is made of this simple cause.
The causes of anti-Semitism lie in the very deepest recesses
of human nature. They are like pebbles at the bottom of a very deep stream. But the waters of the stream are clear and I have no difficulty making them out.
The first cause of Jew-hatred goes back to the nature of
Jewish leadership, a black veil on the conscience of the race. The second goes back to the nature of the people itself, and it is an evil no less foul. The first appears to be an evil without remedy. But the second does not seem to me impossible to deal with.
Beginning with the Lord God of Israel himself, it was the successive leaders of Israel who one by one foregathered
and guided the tragic career of the Jews – tragic to the Jews and no less tragic to the neighbouring nations who have suffered them. But we must have been a pretty horrible people to start with. Our major vice of old, as of today, is parasitism. We are a people of vultures living on the labor and the good nature of the rest of the world.
But, despite our faults, we would never have done so much
damage to the world if it had not been for our genius for evil leadership. Granted our parasitism. But Parasitism is a virtue as well as an evil. Certain germ-parasites are essential to the steady flow of blood through the arteries of an organic body. Certain social parasites, by the same dispensation, are
important to the functioning of the blood of the body politic. The shame of Israel comes not of our being the bankers and the old clothes-men of the world. It comes, rather, of the stupendous hypocrisy and cruelty imposed on us by our fatal
leadership, and by us on the rest of the world.
dia61 says
Thank you for your kind words.
Obama and all of his minions are enablers to this Islamist madness. I think that part that disturbed me the most about “The Redirection” is that all of the “planners” knew that they were effectively taking the lid off of Pandora’s Box, thus creating a Syrian genocide. But, the Saudis were so cocky and so confident, that they were sure that they could contain the violence. In other words, they were OK with the ethic cleansing be
Charles says
McCain should be institutionalized. Graham should follow right behind.
Charles says
Obama serves them because of faith and conviction. The rest, Republicans and Democrats have all been bought, either by political contributions, or some other oiling methods.
Charles says
Turkish brutality has always been a constant in European minds. My grandparents came from areas razed in the name of the moon god. The simple mention of Turkish men brought terror to people, men, women and children. Fighting for the lord of darkness turns men into perfect copies of the pedophile Mohammad.
Larry says
THE GERMANS TRAINED & EQUIPPED THE OTTOMAN’S ARMY
The Ottoman – German Alliance was an alliance between the German Empire and the Ottoman Empire that was ratified shortly following the outbreak of World War I.
The alliance was created as part of a joint-cooperative effort that would strengthen and modernize the ailing Ottoman military, as well as provide Germany safe passage into neighboring British colonies.
On the eve of the First World War, the Ottoman Empire was in ruinous shape. As a result of subsequent wars fought in this period, territories were lost, the economy was in shambles and people were demoralized and tired. What the Empire needed was time to recover and to carry out reforms; however, there was no time, because the world was sliding into war and the Ottoman Empire was highly unlikely to manage to remain outside the coming conflict. Since staying neutral and focusing on recovery did not appear to be possible, the Empire had to ally with one or the other camp, because, after the Italo-Turkish War and Balkan Wars,
it was completely out of resources. There were not adequate quantities of weaponry and machinery left; and neither did the Empire have the financial means to purchase new ones. The only option for the Sublime Port was to establish an alliance with a European power; and at first it did not really matter which one that would be. As Talat Paşa, the Minister of Interior, wrote in his memoirs: “Turkey needed to join
one of the country groups so that it could organize its domestic administration, strengthen and maintain its commerce and industry, expand its railroads, in short to survive and to preserve its existence.”
The problem was that most European powers were not keen to conclude an alliance with the ailing Ottoman Empire. Already at the beginning of the Turko-Italian War in Northern Africa, the Grand Vizier Sait Halim Paşa had expressed the government’s desire, and the Turkish ambassadors were asked to find out whether the European capitals would
be interested. Only Russia seemed to have an interest – however, under conditions that would have amounted a Russian protectorate on the Ottoman lands. It was impossible to reconcile an alliance with the French: as France’s main ally was Russia, the long-time enemy of the Ottoman Empire since the War of 1828. Great Britain declined an Ottoman request.
The Ottoman Sultan Mehmed V specifically wanted the Empire to remain a non-belligerent nation. However pressure from some of Mehmed’s senior advisors led the Empire to align with the Central Powers. Whilst Great Britain was unenthusiastic about aligning with the Ottoman Empire Germany was enthusiastic.
Germany needed the Ottoman Empire on its side. The Orient Express had run directly to Constantinople since 1889, and prior to the First World War the Sultan had consented to a plan to extend it through Anatolia to Baghdad under German auspices. This would strengthen the Ottoman Empire’s link
with industrialised Europe, while also giving Germany easier access to its African colonies and to trade markets in India. To keep the Ottoman Empire from joining the Triple Entente, Germany encouraged Romania and Bulgaria to enter the Central Powers.
A secret treaty was concluded between the Ottoman Empire and the German Empire on August 2, 1914. The Ottoman Empire was to enter the war on the side of the Central Powers one day after the German Empire declared war on Russia.[1] The alliance was ratified on 2 August by many high ranking Ottoman officials, including Grand Vizier Said Halim Pasha, the Minister of War Enver Pasha, the Interior Minister Talat Pasha, and Head of Parliament Halil Bey.
However, there was no signature from the House of Osman as the Sultan Mehmed V did not sign it. The Sultan was the Commander-in-Chief of the Army, as written in the constitution, this made the legitimacy of the Alliance questionable. This meant that the army was not be able to fight on behalf of the Sultan. The Sultan himself had wanted the Empire to remain neutral.
He did not wish to command a war himself and as such left the Cabinet to do much of his bidding. The third member of the cabinet of the Three Pashas Djemal Pasha also did not sign the treaty as he had tried to form an alliance with France. The Alliance was not universally accepted by all parts of the
Ottoman government (see below Geoffrey Miller “Turkey enters the war”).
The Ottoman Empire did not enter the war until German elements in the Ottoman Navy took matters into their own hands and bombarded Russian ports on the 29th of October 1914.
Larry says
BUSH IS A MARRANO JEW! KERRY IS A MARRANO JEW & SO ARE HUNDREDS MORE IN HIGH PLACES:
“THE TALMUD IS ONE OF THE WONDERS OF THE WORLD
The official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud
published in 1935 was “Translated into English with Notes, Glossary and Indices” by such eminent Talmudic scholars as Rabbi Dr. I. Epstein, Rabbi Dr. Samuel Daiches, Rabbi Dr. Israel W. Slotki, M.A., Litt.D., The Reverend Dr. A. Cohen, M.A.’, Ph.D., Maurice Simon, M.A., and the Very Reverend The Chief Rabbi Dr. J.H. Hertz wrote the “Foreword” for the Soncino Edition of the Talmud. The Very Reverend Rabbi Hertz was at the time the Chief Rabbi of England.
The world’s leading authorities on the Talmud confirm that the official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud translated into English follows the original texts with great exactness. It is almost a word-for-word translation of the original texts. In his famous classic “The History of the Talmud,” Michael Rodkinson, the leading authority on the Talmud, in collaboration with the celebrated Reverend Dr. Isaac M. Wise states:
“THE TALMUD IS ONE OF THE WONDERS OF THE WORLD. During the twenty centuries of its existence…IT SURVIVED IN ITS ENTIRETY, and not only has the power of its foes FAILED TO DESTROY EVEN A SINGLE LINE, but it has not even
been able materially to weaken its influence for any length of time. IT STILL DOMINATES THE MINDS OF A WHOLE PEOPLE, WHO VENERATE ITS CONTENTS AS DIVINE TRUTH…”
The following are but a few of the many similar quotations with footnotes from the Soncino Edition of the Talmud, the “sort of book” from which Jesus allegedly “drew the teachings which enabled him to revolutionize the world” on “moral and religious” subjects:
SANHEDRIN, 55b-55a: “What is meant by this? – Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that (2) What is the basis of their dispute? – Rab maintains that only he who is able to engage in sexual
intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw guilt (upon the actual offender); whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty (in that respect) (3). But Samuel maintains:
Scriptures writes, (And thou shalt not lie with mankind) as with the lyings of a woman (4). It has been taught in accordance with Rab: Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day; (55a) (he) who commits bestiality, whether naturally or unnaturally: or a woman who causes herself to be bestiality abused, whether naturally or unnaturally, is liable to punishment (5).”
This “divine truth” which “a whole people venerate” of which “not a single letter of it is missing” and today “is flourishing to such a degree as cannot be found in its history” is illustrated by the additional verbatim quotations which follow:
SANHEDRIN, 55b: “A maiden three years and a day may
be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; (if a niddah) she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon (a person afflicted with gonorrhea).”
(footnotes) “(2) His wife derives no pleasure from this, and hence there is no cleaving. (3) A variant reading of this
passage is: Is there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen. Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew. (4) By taking the two in conjunction, the latter as illustrating the former, we learn that the guilt of violating the injunction `to his wife but not to his neighbor’s wife’ is incurred only for natural but not for unnatural intercourse.”
SANHEDRIN, 69b “Our rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with her young son (a minor), and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her, -Beth Shammai says, he thereby renders her unfit for the priesthood (1). Beth Hillel declares her fit…All agree that the connection of a boy nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not (2); their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old.
KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. “Rabba said, It means (5) this: When
a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (6), it is as if one puts the finger in the eye (7), but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown up woman, he makes her as `a girl who is injured by a piece of wood’ “.
(footnotes) “(5). Lit., `says’. (6) Lit., `here’, that is, less than three years old. (7) Tears come to the eyes again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.”
KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. “Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown up woman makes her (as though she were ) injured by a piece of wood (1). Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a
piece of wood.”
(footnotes) “(1) Although the intercourse of a small
boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood.”
ABODAH ZARAH, 36b-37a. “R. Naham b. Isaac said:
They decreed in connection with a heathen child that it would cause defilement by seminal emission (2) so that an Israelite child should not become accustomed to commit pederasty with it…From what age does a heathen child cause defilement by seminal emission? From the age of nine years and one day.
(37a) for inasmuch as he is then capable of the sexual act he likewise defiles by emission. Rabina said: It is therefore to be concluded that a heathen girl (communicates defilement) from the age of three years and one day, for inasmuch as she is then capable of the sexual act she likewise defiles by a flux.
SOTAH, 26b. “R. Papa said: It excludes an animal, because there is not adultery in connection with an animal (4). Raba of
Parazika (5) asked R. Ashi, Whence is the statement which the Rabbis made that there is no adultery in connection with an animal? Because it is written, Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot or the wages of a dog etc.; (6) and it has been taught: The hire of a dog (7) and the wages of a harlot (8) are
permissible, as it is said, Even both of these (9) – the two (specified texts are abominations) but not four (10)…As lying with mankind. (12) But, said Raba, it excludes the case where he warned her against contact of the bodies (13). Abaye said to him, That is merely an obscene act (and not adultery), and
did the All-Merciful prohibit (a wife to her husband) for an obscene act?”
Of the “sacred” Talmudic teachings of the “Sages,” preserved since 500 A.D. and taught more widely today than ever before in Talmud-Torah schools in the U.S.A., perhaps nothing better
illustrates “fools” with “reprobate minds” than the teaching in the Talmud book of Yebamoth that spittle on the top of the bed curtain proves that a wife has been guilty of adultery, as only
lying down face upwards could she have spit up on it. Spitting several feet straight up! The Talmud states: “When a peddler leaves a house and the woman within is fastening her sinnar [breech-cloth] … . If spittle is found on the upper part of the curtained bed she must, said Rabbi, go.”
Footnote: “Even if there were no witnesses that misconduct took place.” Further footnote: “Only the woman lying face upwards could have spat on the spot. Intercourse may, there fore, be suspected.”
Charles says
Don´t forget BHO considers Erdogan his close friend, and wants his daughters to follow the model of Erdogan´s daughters.
His words, not mine.
Mikasi says
Read Raymond’s article on Turkey. March 26. Obama backs Ergodan. It’s happening again to Armenians. Who will stop them?
Charles says
Nobody. Who is stopping Boko Haram and all the other savages annihilating Christianity in the land of Its birth?
reason1984 says
75% of all US military deaths in Afghanistan have occurred on, Nobel Peace Prize winner, Obama’s watch.
x2a says
This is stupid, mostly because no one bothers to think beyond the immediate facts. You can’t enter a war then just pull out on a whim, there are serious repercussions for things like that. Obama’s administration didn’t enter the wars and are trying to reasonably withdraw, but it’s not as easy as snapping a finger and recalling everyone.
reason1984 says
5+ years is hardly a ‘snap of a finger.’
‘Stupid?’
Nation Building (COIN)
Suicidal ROEs
Doubling down on failure…’stupid.’
Yes, those prickly ‘immediate facts.’ Hard to ignore them at times.
75% of all US military deaths in Afghanistan have occurred on Obama’s watch. Godspeed.
‘Reasonably withdraw,’ indeed.
Go tell the Spartans…
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2014/02/14/i-didnt-join-to-be-sacrified-troops-fed-up-with-risky-afghanistan-strategy-n1795129
Larry says
ON WHOSE WATCH DID THE 55,000,000 AMERICANS DIE?
reason1984 says
YO HOMER,
STICK WITH ALEX JONES!!!!!
That was hard to do.
[email protected] says
To sylva p. – Spoken like a true liberal! God forbid anyone should ever speak of Obama’s true islamist connections–AND THERE ARE TOO MANY TO ENNUMERATE! BTW, hindsight is always 20/20. Would you rather that President Bush (2) had announced to the whole muslim world that “the religion of islam” had caused the 9/11 atrocity? Imagine the world-wide ramifications of that kind of ‘shoot-from-the-hip’ strategy? President Bush announced that he would bring the perps to justice. He captured and imprisoned many of them, as well as having given Iraq a viable democratic alternative to a 7th century dictator who used WMD on his OWN PEOPLE!!!!! Obama’s ‘strategies’ have essentially undone everything that the Bush Administration accomplished in the Middle East–thank you very much!!!
DON’T TELL ME BUSH CAUSED THIS MESS!!!! YOU’RE PATHETIC!!!!!
[email protected] says
P.S. May God give strength and comfort to this beautiful woman’s family members. Isn’t it just so like these muslime scums to attack the most vulnerable defenseless innocent person that they could possibly find??? ABJECT DEGENERATE COWARDS!!!!!
Larry says
YO,
GET ON THE PHONE & ASK GOD WHAT THE FUCK HE/SHE/IT IS DOING ABOUT THE SLAUGHTER OF INNOCENTS IN THE WORLD!
WOMEN ARE SLAUGHTERING HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF INNOCENT VICTIMS, WORLDWIDE & EVERYONE IS TALKING ABOUT WHAT DEPRAVED MOHAMMEDANS ARE DOING!
WOMEN HAVE SLAUGHTERED MORE INNOCENT VICTIMS THAN STALIN, HITLER & MUHAMMAD.
THINK ABOUT IT.
[email protected] says
To “Larry” – I’m only going to say this once–SO GET A GRIP!!!
Your comments are way beyond being offensive to everyone on this website–MOST OF ALL, TO ME!!!!!
I don’t care about anything you have to say because your mind is so corrupted with FILTHY DISGUSTING TERMINOLOGY!!!
I will never again respond to anything you post here, because I will DELETE your comments immediately without reading them.
Here–here’s a treat for you….
It’s a delicious dish of your favorite dessert–but just one thing–IT’S GENEROUSLY GARNISHED WITH SOME OF YOUR VERY OWN FRESHLY DEPOSITED EXCREMENT!!!!! I know you are savagely salivating!!!!!
NOW, GO AND “THINK ABOUT” THAT YOU NEANDERTHAL DUMB-ASS–BECAUSE THAT’S EXACTLY HOW EVERYTHING YOU HAVE TO SAY ON THIS BLOGSITE COMES ACROSS!!!!!
P.S. My advice to all readers of Mr. Ibrahim’s blogsite–DO NOT READ OR RESPOND TO ANY COMMENTS BY “Larry” on this blogsite! HE IS A MORON AND AN IDIOT!!!!!
Larry says
BYEEEEEEEEE HOMER!
YOU are a product of Western “education”!
Like a Pig, you wallow in SHIT & think its TRUTH!
If its not on FOX News or CNN, then it didn’t happen!
AMERICA HAS TALENT!
Miley Cyrus: A BITCH ON HEAT!
Barack Obama: A FAGGOT PRETENDING TO BE STRAIGHT!
THIS IS THE 21st CENTURY FACE OF AMERICA!
Charles says
You should seek treatment. Rapidly!
loveshisidandjacks says
Proof, please.
Otherwise … shut up. You’re delusional
Larry says
The Economic Disaster Inflicted by Abortion: Roe v Wade as Financial Holocaust
By Kelly OConnell (Bio and Archives) Monday, June 4, 2012
We normally do not consider abortion in economic terms. Usually it’s tagged a legal, human rights, or liberty matter. Yet the economic fallout has been a financial bloodbath for America’s tax revenues, economic growth, immigration policy, and Social Security. In fact, it’s been such a massive attack upon US prosperity it’s surprising it’s not normally analyzed from this angle. But one does not need a degree in finance to understand the loss of 55,000,000 Americans has grave
economic consequences.
I. Abortions Since Roe v. Wade
One group estimated there have been over 55 million abortions since 1973:
In a new document,
“Abortion Statistics: United States Data and Trends,” estimates that there have been 54,559,615 abortions since 1973 based on data from both the Centers for Disease Control and the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute, a former Planned Parenthood research arm. Guttmacher receives
numbers directly from abortion centers themselves and is the prime source for more current figures because the Centers for Disease Control has never tabulated accurate numbers of abortions.
II. How Many Total Persons Lost?
Starting with 55 million aborted fetuses,let’s assume about 5% of these unborn—or 2.5 million—would have been lost for some reason—medical, such as deformities, etc. Because some abortions are done for this purpose, which also include aborting Down Syndromes, etc. Plus some would be born dead, anyway.
Given 52.5 million live births, how many would have lived to child-bearing years? Let’s say another 5% of all persons are lost before they will reproduce. The average American woman has 2.5 children in her lifetime. If half of the 50 million persons aborted were women, that leaves 25 million women who would have had 62.5 million descendants. Further, these 60 million would themselves have had more children starting approximately 1985. That would have added, let’s say, another 30 million females. At even 1.5 children a piece, that would add another 45 million by 2012.
That leaves a gap of 50 million + 60 million + 45 million potential but canceled Americans, meaning that 155 million more Americans would have been produced. This is a staggering number.
III. How Much Lost Productivity & Tax Revenue?
If there were only 135 million Americans lost to abortion, how much income and taxes and Social Security has been lost? Median income for men since 1970 has been approximately $45,000 dollars, judged by 2009 dollars. Since women earn less on average, and to err on the side of caution, let’s call the median $30,000.
Let’s say 25-30% of the population never works for whatever reason, that still easily leaves at least 100 million Americans employed. If the average American works 30 years, that would be 100,000,000 X $30,000 x 30 years.
That income would equal $90 trillion dollars. Over the last 40 years, there has been much variation in federal tax rates. Given the mean and average over all income brackets of the past 40 years of US federal tax, the figure 25% is surely not excessive, bearing in mind that since the 1970’s the rate was at least 14% for the lowest bracket every year.
So, 25% of $90,000,000,000,000 would be $22.50 trillion. This is how much federal tax revenue has been lost due to earners being aborted out of the American economy.
Social Security tax rates have varied between 4.3% and 5.6% since 1971, but to err on the side of caution, let’s average that to 4%. Therefore, on income of $90 trillion, 4% of that would be $4.4 trillion in lost Social Security taxes for the state coffers.
Total government revenue from income is now at 35%.
But let’s measure that at 30% since 1970. Taking the 30% of $90 trillion would mean we are missing $27 trillion from aborted workers, at the federal and state level.
Since this is an admittedly basic analysis of the economic impact of abortion on America, any of these figures can be challenged. But, overall, the financial loss must look something like this amount. And if today’s deficit is $15 trillion, even if the outcome were nearly cut in half, we would still be able to pay off the national debt.
IV. Wages of Sin?
One of the most patently obvious aspects of the outcome of four decades of abortion is there is a connection between doing evil acts and the failure of states. For example, the infamous slave economy of ancient Rome kept a real, vibrant economy from arising, since it is impossible for free men to compete with slaves as wage labor. As one writer states:
The wealth of the Republic was built up on the sweat of
the provinces, the loot from wars and the suffering and exploitation of slaves. Like Greece, Rome had inherited a low level of technical skill and achievements were only possible because of the huge amounts of labour and exploitation involved.
Sadly, China—much like America—has chosen to follow humanistic fables such as Malthus’s “earth-is-overpopulated” canard. A current example is China’s own “one-child” policy meant to limit population growth. We can easily deduce this is bad policy given the outcome. China’s one-child-policy wiped out generations of females, causing tens of millions of Chinese men to skip marriage and reproduction. And while
China aspires to lead the globe in business, flushing hundreds of millions of potential workers down the toilet is no way to achieve this ambitious goal. Each worker adds to the sum total of GDP, so dumping workers jettisons higher productivity. When public policy goes against the natural law—whether expressly or by flouting common sense, disaster
is bound to follow. Such will be true of China, including depopulation via heartless abortion policies.
V. Unavoidable Observations
The fiscal results of American abortion can be described as the natural outcome of immoral policy meeting a failed vision in dealing with the inevitable outcome of the sexual revolution. Much like the grimidea of having only one child per Chinese family, the outcome in America was both predictable and malign. Consider the following natural affects of America’s permissive abortion policy:
A. Economic vitality is badly damaged by mass abortions.
When the rate of live births falls versus retirements, then a
shrinking population is forced to support the old age needs of persons no longer able to bolster an economy, while their own prosperity falters.
B. Population growth disappears after abortion policy is enacted
.One writer explains:
The collapse of the former Soviet Union is an example of a
nation whose demographic implosion has contributed to its economic breakdown. “The main reason for their collapse was internal – 300 abortions for every 100 live births for decades. Their future is still grim. Right now, there are not enough younger women to reverse their population decline. Indeed, they are expected to lose another 40 million people between now and 2050.”
C. Respect for Human Life is Coarsened.
Many stories recount Chinese authorities coming to kill newborns of parents violating the one-child policy. At some point, the average person stops distinguishing between killing newborns and late-term abortions, since the difference is arbitrary. Such is the moral degradation of causistry. Reports one site:
China’s “one family—one child” policy results in 13 million abortions every year. Many of these abortions take place under the pressure from authorities. Demographic restrictions are still in effect in China despite the country’s impressive economic growth: familycouples are still legally prohibited from having more than one child. The law per se is a gross violation of human rights, although these rights are violated at a much greater extent by family planning department officials.
D. Pseudo- “Rights” Prop-up Rank Selfishness; Debasing Genuine Human Rights
It cannot aid the common person’s understanding of the theory of natural law when the Constitution is misused to defend such deadly, needlessly violent, deplorably selfish activities as abortion. Such wrong application of America’s foundational concepts merely fuels futurehuman rights debacles. In the meantime, the West’s nonsensical and
emotionally brutal hookup culture constantly puts naïve single women in harm’s way via out-of-wedlock pregnancy and abortions.
E. State Support of Abortion Industry Furthers Destruction of Traditional Family
It’s obvious if a country sponsors expansive abortion policy, this state favors killing fetuses over live births. Such policies create an ownership interest in would-be mothers and defers to the state to empower radical female egalitarianism. This ultimately decouples the members of a marriage and family from each other, substituting the Brave New World of “family planning” which further dehumanizes our existence. Imagine stumbling upon this image:
A morning in Hunan, China, brings an unimaginable sight
of cruelty and horror. Lying in the gutter of a bustling main road is the tiny, twisted body of a dead baby girl. She is naked, surrounded by only dirty pieces of hospital gauze. Buses and bicycles speed past the corpse, spraying it with mud. Nameless and unwanted, the newborn’s been
dumped by the roadside during winter. Few of the locals hurrying by give her a second glance. To them, she is just one of thousands of baby girls abandoned each year as a result of China’s ruthless one-child policy. “I think the baby had just died,” says a woman who was the only person to attempt to rescue the infant. “I touched her skin, and it was warm. Blood was still coming out of her nose
.F. Massive Abortion Numbers Defy Millions of Couples Hoping to Adopt
The number of would-be adoptive parents so far outstrips the supply in America (according to one source—a million couples matching the million abortions) as to utterly shatter self-serving leftist abortion arguments. Liberals would have Americans believe it is better to kill a baby than allow it to come into an uncertain or uncaring world. What a joke! Writes one source:
Each year in the United States, about 51,000 American
children are placed for adoption. In addition, about 6,500 foreign children are adopted by Americans, for a total of a little under 58,000 children adopted per year. Experts estimate somewhere between one and two million couples seek to adopt yearly. Every year there are about 1.3 million abortions. Only 4% of women with unwanted pregnancies give their children up for adoption. Planned Parenthood often justifies
abortion with the slogan, “Every child a wanted child”. Every childis wanted, and wanted desperately.
Conclusion:
The fiscal failure of abortion is certainly a financial bloodbath.
Yet, on a deeper level the failure to define fetuses as spiritual beings in need of society’s protective love creates an indefensible human rights disaster. Morally obtuse advocates offer hare-brained arguments defying common sense, representing sanctimonious excuses for irresponsibility. But one must wonder about the ethics of a society who moves heaven and earth to help the “poor,” yet takes the most vulnerable and simply runs them through a blender.
America should draw the conclusion after abolishing slavery that one can never do an “economic analysis” that is satisfactory without including a moral survey, as well. Fortunately, more Americans appear tobe waking up to the fact that abortion is an utterly indefensible practice, as over 60% oppose the procedure.
But how long can we continue to ignore and trample the rights of the weakest and most vulnerable yet still expect national blessings?
Kelly O’Connell is an author and attorney. He was born on the West Coast, raised in Las Vegas, and matriculated from the University of Oregon.
[email protected] says
To Raymond Ibrahim – Your keen insight and knowledgeable understanding of the deceptions of islam is greatly needed and appreciated! Thank you for this excellent forum which allows your readers to enter a dialog with you, and with each other. Unfortunately, there will always be those who think “it’s all about them”. They are trolls and insolent bigots, as everyone readily recognizes. As for me personally, I will no longer either read or respond to any of their filthy diatribes.
GOD BLESS YOU, AND THANK YOU AGAIN, IN YOUR EFFORTS TO ENLIGHTEN AND EDUCATE THE WESTERN WORLD ABOUT THE EVILS OF ISLAM!!!!!
iceykola says
Obama and Bush are puppets… it’s neither of theirs… they’re all under Israel’s (Zionist) control…
reason1984 says
Obama is mesmerized by the Muslim Brotherhood…Zionism? Not so much.
Larry says
YO HOMER,
Bombshell:
Barack Obama conclusively outed as CIA creation
NEWS ALERT: Investigative journalist Wayne Madsen is
scheduled to appear live on the Alex Jones Show tomorrow
THURSDAY AUGUST 19 at 1 PM EST / 12 NOON CST, to reveal his groundbreaking series on Barack Obama’s true origins. Madsen will share the bombshell revelations and extensive information from the following three articles– and even more that has not yet been revealed. Tell your friends, family and contacts to tune in and learn the truth. Also visit the Wayne Madsen Report for further research and other exclusive reports.
reason1984 says
‘The Alex Jones Show…’
Okay, now I get it.
The operative word is ‘Show.’
marla1 says
He is the one who put the muslim brotherhood slime in the white house you cursed moron! He is a muslin trying to wear Christian clothing to fool America and you morons still refuse to see it!!!!
Charles says
Because one was a fool serving his “friend’s” interests. Obama is an entirely different story. Educate yourself and don´t believe the official story.
Larry says
OBAMA IS A CIA AGENT & NOW RUNS ALL OPERATION SINCE HE BECAME PRESIDENT OF THE USA!
SOROS, KISSINGER & CO ARE HIS BACKERS!
bj affordable says
We need to take up arms. And now!
reason1984 says
Against whom?
Larry says
YO HOMER,
SOROS, BUSH/CIA, KISSINGER & CO
ROTHSCHILD/ROCKEFELLER & CO
ISRAEL/SAUDI ARABIA
AND A FEW OTHERS!
BJ,
THEY HAVE YOU BY THE BALLS!
reason1984 says
What do you propose?
Charles says
For starters, use bikes and public transportation.
Nobody said it was going to be easy … Are you ready to sacrifice American/West comforts?
marla1 says
Blow up one mosque in every state at what they call prayer time and I bet you will see a lot of self deporting muslim slime! Every one is so afraid of the 1 muslim in the white house it is sinful to see what one communist fraud terrorist has been set up to destroy and Americans are so stupid they are allowing him. Get term Limits and get rid of the old career communist politicial sewer rats in the white house or our we will be living under communism! Bill Clinton said we the people would adjust to it. Lets make sure this lesbian wife is never president! A stroke would be proper for her !!!!
DogWithoutSlippers says
Why is Obama supporting these scumbags? Tell me!~
reason1984 says
Obama is heavily influenced by the MB’s political philosophy. Recall that Obama’s father was a virulent anti-colonialist.
Hasan al-Banna found his calling as an anti-colonialist, a fierce advocate for Shariah law, and a return to the right path of Islamic rule.
Hasan al-Banna was the father of the MB.
Case in point:
http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2014/03/26/a-detailed-look-at-the-purge-of-u-s-counter-terrorism-training-by-the-obama-administration/
Larry says
YO HOMER,
YOUR HISTORY STARTS & FINISHES WITH FOX NEWS etc.
OBAMA COULDN’T RUN A PAKISTANI CORNER SHOP!
HE IS THE MONKEY & SOROS/BRZEZINSKI/KISSINGER & CO ARE THE ORGAN GRINDERS.
OBAMA’S PUPPETEER
Brzezinski’s Interview with Le Nouvel Observateur
Le Nouvel Observateur:
Former CIA director Robert Gates states in his memoirs: The American secret services began six months before the Soviet
intervention to support the Mujahideen [in Afghanistan]. At that time you were president Carters security advisor; thus you played a key role in this affair.
Do you confirm this statement?
Zbigniew Brzezinski:
Yes. According to the official version, the CIA’s support for the Mujahideen began in 1980, i.e. after the Soviet army’s invasion of Afghanistan
on 24 December 1979. But the reality, which was kept secret until today, is completely different: Actually it was on 3 July 1979 that president Carter signed the first directive for the secret support of the opposition against the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul.
And on the same day I wrote a note, in which I explained to the president that this support would in my opinion lead to a military intervention by the Soviets.
Le Nouvel Observateur:
Despite this risk you were a supporter of this covert action? But perhaps you expected the Soviets to enter this war and tried to provoke it?
Zbigniew Brzezinski:
It’s not exactly like that. We didn’t push the Russians to intervene but we knowingly increased the probability that they would do it.
Le Nouvel Observateur:
When the Soviets justified their intervention with the statement that they were fighting against a secret US interference in Afghanistan, nobody believed them. Nevertheless there was a core of truth to this…Do you regret nothing today?
Zbigniew Brzezinski:
Regret what? This secret operation was an excellent idea. It lured the Russians into the Afghan trap, and you would like me to regret that? On the day when the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote president Carter, in essence: “We now have the opportunity to
provide the USSR with their Viet Nam war.” Indeed for ten years Moscow had to conduct a war that was intolerable for the regime, a conflict which involved the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet Empire.
Le Nouvel Observateur:
And also, don’t you regret having helped future terrorists, having given them weapons and advice?
Zbigniew Brzezinski:
What is most important for world history? The Taliban or the fall of the Soviet Empire? Some Islamic hotheads or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?
Le Nouvel Observateur:
“Some hotheads?” But it has been said time and time again: today Islamic fundamentalism represents a world-wide threat…
Zbigniew Brzezinski:
Rubbish! It’s said that the West has a global policy regarding Islam. That’s hogwash: there is no global Islam. Let’s look at Islam in a rational and not a demagogic or emotional way. It is the first world
religion with 1.5 billion adherents. But what is there in common between fundamentalist Saudi Arabia, moderate Morocco,
militaristic Pakistan, pro-Western Egypt and secularized Central Asia? Nothing more than that which connects the Christian countries…
Larry says
YO HOMER,
Muslim Brotherhood created by British Intelligence
Dr. John
Coleman, a former British Intelligence agent…states in his report on
Iran’s Islamic Revolution that the Muslim Brotherhood was created by
“the great names of British Middle East intelligence”…and that their
mission was to “keep the Middle East backward so that its natural
resource, oil, could continue to be looted…”
The Muslim
Brotherhood is a London creation, forged as the standard-bearer of an
ancient, anti-religious (pagan) heresy that has plagued Islam since the
establishment of the Islamic community (umma) by the Prophet Mohammed in
the seventh century. Representing organized Islamic fundamentalism, the
organization called the Muslim Brotherhood (Ikhwan al-Muslimum in
Arabic) was officially founded in Egypt, in 1929, by the British agent
Hasan al-Banna, a Sufi mystic. Today, the Muslim Brotherhood is the
umbrella under which a host of fundamentalist Sufi, Sunni, and radical
Shiite brotherhoods and societies flourish.
The Muslim
Brotherhood is a tool by the British-based Globalists whose main
objective is to overthrow the established world order and create a new
one-world system of global governance.
Without the British,
“radical Islam would have remained the illegitimate, repressive minority
movement that it has always been, and the Middle East would have
remained stable and prosperous.”
The real Muslim Brothers
are…the secretive bankers and financiers who stand behind the curtain,
the members of the old Arab, Turkish, or Persian families whose
genealogy places them in the oligarchic elite, with smooth business and
intelligence associations to the European black nobility and,
especially, to the British oligarchy.
By fabricating a bogus war
between Islamic fundamentalism and the West, the globalists are able to
attack their real enemy, humanity. Pulling the strings, they will ensure
that both Western and Muslim states are degraded and finally completely
subjugated to their odious rule.
The globalists have long been using wars to subvert, demoralize and destroy Western civilization.
They
plan a new feudalism that will impoverish the middle classes,
depopulate and enslave the masses, and leave only the rich served by a
technocracy. The whole world will resemble a repressive third world
country governed by the IMF, UN and World Bank.
The globalists
are headquartered in London and centred on the Rothschild-dominated Bank
of England, MI-6 and the secretive Round Table society, which spawned
the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Charles says
You make it sound like Coleman was British intelligence at the time the Brotherhood was created. He was BORN in 1935 and is a conspiracy theorists, selling his wisdom in his Web page.
He was not there in 1928. He is just another researcher and profits from his theories. Obviously you got one of his reports.
reason1984 says
Your talking to an Alex Jones follower.
Robin Rosenblatt says
This has been going on for the last 1400 years it about time people started paying attention.
Islam is Evil.
What part of Evil do you not understand? Islam enslaves your minds, your bodies
and your souls. It must be destroyed.
Islamic Culture is a Hate, War, Violent and Slave Culture.
Larry says
TALMUDIC JUDAISM IS EVIL & SPAWNED ROMANISM & MOHAMMEDANISM.
Charles says
Are you for real? Are you also going to blame the Jews for the pedophile leader of the savages? Get a grip and start getting yourself better informed. Although I think you are one of the useful idiots spreading the filth you have been taught to believe in.In this case you are beyond repair.
Larry says
It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.
THREE YEAR OLD BRIDES
When Jesus of Nazareth accused the Pharisees of His day of being Satan’s spiritual children, He fully realized what they were capable of. Second century Rabbi Simeon ben Yohai, one of Judaism’s very greatest rabbis and a creator of Kabbalah, sanctioned pedophilia — permitting molestation [raping] of baby girls even younger than three! He proclaimed, “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and a day is permitted to marry a priest.” (1) Subsequent rabbis refer to ben Yohai’s endorsement of pedophilia as “halakah”, or binding Jewish law. (2) Has ben Yohai, child rape advocate, been disowned by modern Jews?
Hardly. Today, in ben Yohai’s hometown of Meron, Israel, tens of thousands of orthodox and ultra-orthodox Jews gather annually for days and nights of singing and dancing in his memory.
References to pedophilia abound in the Talmud. They occupy considerable sections of Treatises Kethuboth and Yebamoth and are enthusiastically endorsed by the Talmud’s definitive legal work, Treatise Sanhedrin.
THE PHARISEES ENDORSED CHILD SEX
The rabbis of the Talmud are notorious for their legal hairsplitting, and quibbling debates. But they share rare agreement about their right to molest three year old girls. In
contrast to many hotly debated issues, hardly a hint of dissent rises against the prevailing opinion (expressed in many clear passages) that pedophilia is not only normal but scriptural as well! It’s as if the rabbis have found an exalted truth whose majesty silences debate.
Because the Talmudic authorities who sanction pedophilia are so renowned, and because pedophilia as “halakah” is so explicitly emphasized, not even the translators of the Soncino edition of the Talmud (1936) dared insert a footnote suggesting the slightest criticism. They only comment: “Marriage, of course, was then at a far earlier age than now.” (3)
In fact, footnote 5 to Sanhedrin 60b rejects the right of a
Talmudic rabbi to disagree with ben Yohai’s endorsement of pedophilia: “How could they [the rabbis], contrary to the opinion of R. Simeon ben Yohai, which has scriptural support, forbid the marriage of the young proselyte?” (4)
OUT OF BABYLON
It was in Babylon after the exile under Nebuchadnezzar
in 597 BC that Judaism’s leading sages probably began to indulge in pedophilia.
Babylon was the staggeringly immoral capitol of the ancient world. For 1600 years, the world’s largest population of Jews flourished within it. [Ashkenazik Shinar (‘sin’) was a stone throw away from Sodom and Gomorrah – Any questions?]
As an example of their evil, Babylonian priests said a man’s religious duty included regular sex with temple prostitutes. Bestiality was widely tolerated. So Babylonians hardly cared whether a rabbi married [raped] a three year old girl.
But with expulsion of the Jews [‘Edomites, Pharisees, Ashkenazim, Khazars, Sephardim’] in the 11th century AD,
mostly to western Christian lands, Gentile tolerance of Jewish pedophilia abruptly ended.
Still, a shocking contradiction lingers: If Jews want to revere the transcendent wisdom and moral guidance of the Pharisees and their Talmud, they must accept the right of their greatest ancient sages to violate children. To this hour, no synod of Judaism has repudiated their vile practice.
SEX WITH A “MINOR” PERMITTED
What exactly did these sages say?
The Pharisees justified child rape by explaining that a boy of nine years was not a “man”. Thus they exempted him from God’s Mosaic Law: “You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination” (Lev. 18:22) One passage in the Talmud gives permission for a woman who
molested her young son to marry a high priest. It concludes, “All agree that the connection of a boy aged nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not.” (5) Because a boy under 9 is sexually immature, he can’t “throw guilt” on the active offender, morally or legally. (6)
A woman could molest a young boy without questions of morality even being raised: “…the intercourse of a small
boy is not regarded as a sexual act.” (7) The Talmud also
says, “A male aged nine years and a day who cohabits with his deceased brother’s wife acquires her (as wife).” (8) Clearly, the Talmud teaches that a woman is permitted to marry and have sex with a nine year old boy.
SEX AT THREE YEARS & ONE DAY
In contrast to Simeon ben Yohai’s dictum that sex with a little girl is permitted under the age of three years, the general teaching of the Talmud is that the rabbi must wait until a
day after her third birthday. She could be taken in marriage simply by the act of rape. [these were the ‘precursors’ of Hillary, Pelosi, Kagan, Napolitano, Ginsburg, Boxer, Albright, Abzug, Goldman, Livni, ad nauseam]
R. Joseph said: “Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with her, she becomes his.” (Sanhedrin. 55b)
“A girl who is three years of age and one day may be betrothed by cohabitation …” (Yeb. 57b)
A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabited with her she becomes his. (Sanh. 69a, 69b, also discussed in Yeb. 60b)
It was taught: R. Simeon b. Yohai stated: “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest, for it is said, But all the women children that have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves, and Phineas (who was priest, the footnote says) surely was with them.” (Yeb. 60b)
[The Talmud says such three year and a day old girls are] “… fit for cohabitation … But all women children, that have not known man by lying with him, it must be concluded that Scripture speaks of one who is fit for cohabitation.” (Footnote to Yeb. 60b)
The example of Phineas, a priest, himself marrying an underage virgin of three years is considered by the Talmud as proof that such infants are “fit for cohabitation.”
The Talmud teaches that an adult woman’s molestation of a nine year old boy is “not a sexual act” and cannot “throw guilt” upon her because the little boy is not truly a “man.” (9) But they use opposite logic to sanction rape of little girls aged three years and one day: Such infants they count as “women,” sexually mature and fully responsible to comply with the requirements of marriage.
The Talmud footnotes 3 and 4 to Sanhedrin 55a clearly tell us when the rabbis considered a boy and girl sexually mature and thus ready for marriage. “At nine years a male attains sexual matureness… The sexual matureness of woman is reached at the age of three.”
NO RIGHTS FOR CHILD VICTIMS
The Pharisees were hardly ignorant of the trauma felt by molested children. To complicate redress, the Talmud says a rape victim must wait until she was of age before there would be any possibility of restitution. She must prove that she lived and would live as a devoted Jewess, and she must protest the loss of her virginity on the very hour she comes of age. “As soon as she was of age one hour and did not protest she cannot protest any more.” (10)
The Talmud defends these strict measures as necessary to forestall the possibility of a Gentile child bride rebelling against Judaism and spending the damages awarded to her as a heathen – an unthinkable blasphemy! But the rights of the little girl were really of no great consequence, for, “When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (three years and a day) it
is as if one put the finger into the eye.” The footnote
says that as “tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.” (11)
In most cases, the Talmud affirms the innocence of male and female victims of pedophilia. Defenders of the Talmud claim this proves the Talmud’s amazing moral advancement and
benevolence toward children; they say it contrasts favorably with “primitive” societies where the child would have been stoned along with the adult perpetrator.
Actually, the rabbis, from self-protection, were intent on proving the innocence of both parties involved in pedophilia: the child, but more importantly, the pedophile. They stripped a little boy of his right to “throw guilt” on his assailant and
demanded complicity in sex from a little girl. By thus providing no significant moral or legal recourse for the child, the Talmud clearly reveals whose side it is on: the raping rabbi.
PEDOPHILIA WIDESPREAD
Child rape was practiced in the highest circles of Judaism . This is illustrated from Yeb. 60b:
“There was a certain town in the land of Israel the legitimacy of whose inhabitants was disputed, and Rabbi sent R. Romanos who conducted an inquiry and found in it
the daughter of a proselyte who was under the age of three years and one day, and Rabbi declared her eligible to live with a priest.”
The footnote says that she was “married to a priest” and the rabbi simply permitted her to live with her husband, thus upholding “halakah” as well as the dictum of Simeon ben Yohai, “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest.” (12)
These child brides were expected to submit willingly to sex. Yeb. 12b confirms that under eleven years and one day a little girl is not permitted to use a contraceptive but “must carry on her marital intercourse in the usual manner.”
In Sanhedrin 76b a blessing is given to the man who marries off his children before they reach the age of puberty, with a contrasting curse on anyone who waits longer. In fact, failure
to have married off one’s daughter by the time she is 12-1/2, the Talmud says, is as bad as one who “returns a
lost article to a Cuthean” (Gentile) – a deed for which “the Lord will not spare him.” (13)
This passage says: “… it is meritorious to marry off one’s children whilst minors.”
The mind reels at the damage to the untold numbers of girls who were sexually abused within Judaism during the heyday of pedophilia. Such child abuse, definitely practiced in the
second century, continued, at least in Babylon, for another 900 years.
A FASCINATION WITH SEX
Perusing the Talmud, one is overwhelmed with the recurrent preoccupation with sex, especially by the most eminent rabbis. Dozens of illustrations could be presented to illustrate the delight of the Pharisees to discuss sex and quibble over its minutest details.
The rabbis endorsing child sex undoubtedly practiced what they preached. Yet to this hour, their words are revered. Simeon ben Yohai is honored by Orthodox Jews as one of the very greatest sages and spiritual lights the world has ever known [!!!]. A member of the earliest “Tannaim,” rabbis most influential in creating the Talmud, he carries more authority to observant Jews than Moses.
Today, the Talmud’s outspoken pedophiles and child-rape advocates would doubtlessly spend hard time in prison for child molestation. Yet here is what the eminent Jewish scholar, Dagobert Runes (who is fully aware of all these passages), says about such “dirty old men” and their perverted teachings:
“There is no truth whatever in Christian and other strictures against the Pharisees, who represented the finest traditions of their people and of human morals.” (14)
AREN’T THE WORDS OF JESUS MORE APPROPRIATE?
“Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for
ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness. Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and
iniquity.” (Matthew 23:27, 28.)
Endnotes:
1 Yebamoth 60b, p. 402.
2 Yebamoth 60b, p. 403.
3 Sanhedrin 76a.
4 In Yebamoth 60b, p. 404, Rabbi Zera disagrees that sex
with girls under three years and one day should be endorsed as halakah.
5 Sanhedrin 69b.
6 Sanhedrin 55a.
7 Footnote 1 to Kethuboth 11b.
8 Sanhedrin 55b.
9 Sanhedrin 55a.
10 Kethuboth 11a.
11 Kethuboth 11b.
12 Yebamoth 60b.
13 Sanhedrin 76b.
14 Dagobert Runes, A Concise Dictionary of Judaism, New York, 1959.
docwill says
Larry! You’re back! We’ve missed your incredible, self Jew-hating screeds! Please enlighten us further on Islam’s many contributions to world peace! And tell us all about Islamic necrophilia and pedophilia!
Brittania Jones says
Any Religion that is hidden behind to perform acts of cruelty or murder is EVIL! You cannot have a ‘controlling mechanism’ like a religion and not eventually see it evolve into something that is there only to control or oppress. When humans, especially males, are in charge of that religion you see the results every day in the news. War, rape, servitude, trauma, torture, child brides and in-humanity. Personally, I’d outlaw all religion but I’m sure there would be other means of oppression used instead.
Martin Grimes says
Jesus said this would happen and that it will get worse; thank you Raymond for having
the courage and tenacity to report this sad news. My prayers go to the family
Paul B. says
May she rest in peace in the Lord’s arms. I hope she had the grace of martyrdom as she went.
Pray for everyone to wake up to the evil of Islam – the Muslims themselves, and in the West the media and the American electorate.
Larry says
YO RAY,
CUT THE BS!
ROMANISM aka the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, HAS BEEN ONE OF THE GREATEST ENEMIES OF THE COPTIC CHURCH FOR CENTURIES!
TALMUDIC JUDAISM – ROMANISM – MOHAMMEDANIS HAVE ALL THE SAME MURDEROUS SPIRIT & ARE THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!
IN MATTHEW CH 19, JESUS POINTS TO A TIME BEFORE HEBREWISM & JUDAISM!
IN MATTHEW CH 15; CH 19; CH 23 & JOHN CH 8, JESUS SHOWS US THE SPIRIT OF TALMUDIC JUDAISM.
GO TO YOU TUBE & TYPE IN – JOHN LOFTUS, AMERICA’S NAZI SECRET!
MOHAMMEDANISM WOULD BE THE BEST CULT FOR THE NWO!
IT WAS CREATED BY TALMUDIC JEWS & HAS NO MEANS OF GOVERNING ITSELF!
haveittodayray says
And your reply after you google “theprojectmuslimbrotherhood” would be?
reason1984 says
‘ROMANISM aka the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, HAS BEEN ONE OF THE GREATEST ENEMIES OF THE COPTIC CHURCH FOR CENTURIES!’
Stop shouting…the year is 2014…all aboard.
Larry says
YO HOMER,
SEMITE MINDSET!
Muhammed said, “WAR IS BY DECEIT”!
Qur’an (66:2)
– “Allah has already ordained for you, (O men), the dissolution of your
oaths”
From the Hadith:
Bukhari (52:269) – “The Prophet said, ‘War is deceit.'”
The context of this is thought to be the murder of Usayr ibn Zarim and his thirty unarmed men by Muhammad’s men after he “guaranteed” them safe passage.
Bukhari (49:857) – “He who makes peace between the people by
inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar.”
Lying is permitted when the end justifies the means.
Bukhari (84:64-65) – Speaking from a position of power at the time, Ali
confirms that lying is permissible in order to deceive an “enemy.”
Muslim (32:6303) – “…he did not hear that exemption was granted in
anything what the people speak as lie but in three cases: in battle, for
bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted form in order to bring reconciliation between them).”
Bukhari (50:369) – Recounts the murder of a poet, Ka’b bin al-Ashraf, at Muhammad’s insistence. The men who volunteered for the assassination used dishonesty to gain Ka’b’s trust, pretending that they had turned against Muhammad. This drew the victim out of his fortress, whereupon he was brutally slaughtered despite putting up a ferocious struggle for his life.
Mossad say, “BY WAY OF DECEPTION”!
My name is
Aharon Sherf,” he said. “I am the head of the
Academy. Welcome to the Mossad. Its full name is Ha
Mossad, le Modiyn ve le Tafkidim Mayuhadim [the Institute
for Intelligence and Special Operations]. Our motto is:
‘By way of deception, thou shalt do war.’
reason1984 says
Is their a point in there somewhere?
Let’s get back to…
It’s 2014.
The greatest threat to the Coptic Church today, that is the times we live in, is the Muslim Brotherhood…period.
Robin Rosenblatt says
Talmud is a listing of laws and arguments pro and con we take the one that work for us today and if there is no argument that we agreed with we make another that fits our currant times.
Larry says
YO ROB,
ITS CALLED “SITUATION ETHICS”!
THE BABYLONIAN JEWISH TALMUD IS 35vols OF COMMENTARY ON TORAH, WHICH ABOUT 95% of JEWS & 99.9% OF GOYIM KNOW NOTHING ABOUT!
CHECK OUT YOUR LIBRARY & SEE IF THEY HAVE IT OR GOOGLE:
“COME AND HEAR”.
TALMUDIC JEWS & MOHAMMEDANS HAVE THE SAME MINDSET!
reason1984 says
Yo Larry,
Stop yelling. Children yell.
Turn off Caps Lock, and transition into adulthood.
Larry says
YO HOMER,
ALL I SEE IS A BUNCH OF MORONS, ON PAR WITH MOHAMMEDANS, FARTING COMMENTS!
I AM SICK TO DEATH OF CLOWNS WHO REACT TO TALMUDIC TV & THINK THEY ARE INFORMED!
Charles says
You definitely sound like a highly sophisticated individual. I´m afraid I´m not at your level … You sound so superior …
Charles says
“SITUATION ETHICS”? I call it evolution.
DyemondIssa says
These guys should be put to death for murder but the muslim religion should not be held responsible for the actions of these individuals.
Charles says
Study Islam. Then come back and comment.
haveittodayray says
Islam and Sharia law
will come to America in one generation by the stealth invasion equivalent to a
modern version of the “Trojan Horse”, by Muslim immigration. Unless good men
and woman speak up now.
Abraham Lincoln said, “To sin by silence when they should
protest makes cowards of men”. When our
mainstream news will not inform you of one of the main issues of the 21st
Century, due to political correctness,
then it’s time not to be silent anymore.
Muslim refugees from Somalia and other “warzones” to the
tune of 500,000 being relocated to America is the issue. Forget about being labeled a racist, bigot or
being politically correct, silence won’t turn back the tide. This immigration
is a real and growing and is a threatening danger to America. Just look at
Europe today folks. 60 million Muslims immigrated to Europe and 80% are on some
sort of public assistance, bankrupting the towns, cities and countries. Due to
Muslim immigration France is now bankrupt and a welfare State. Is America next?
The time has come to speak up and take a stand folk, for
America. Awareness is the issue as most
families are simply far too busy, working two jobs, raising their children and
do not have a clue or the time to research the issue. Islamic forces are destroying
Europe; they’re in a fight for survival. The root cause is the inevitable
consequences of multiculturalism and immigration plus the alarming birthrate of
Muslims now an average of 8.1 children in each Muslim family. Europe has
literally been invaded. Europe will become an Islamic state due to the
immigration and sheer birthrate of Muslims.
I have done that for you, if you Google
“TheProjectMuslimBrotherhood” you will find that this is their doctrine to destroy America and West from within by
stealth jihad, and lies. Guess what,
the doctrine is over 20 years old, and they are making substantial
progress. We are now approaching 2400
Mosques along with approximately 2.7 million Muslims here in America.
“We will conquer Europe! (They are almost there) We will
conquer America! Not through the sword but through Dawa (proselytizing)
Yosuf-alQarawi, Muslim Brotherhood.”
“We love death more than you love life.” Quoted from the
Fort Hood massacre killer. Islamists
seek civilization Jihad and will stop as they literally follow the Quran.
Although you can find peaceful passages, the Quran speaks violence throughout
it. It is no Bible.
Massive immigration and multiculturalism is literally
destroying most of Europe today. There
are over 700 “Islamic No Go Zones”, within France, England and Germany, where
police cannot enter. Take a look around
you Dearborn, Michigan, Maine, Tennessee, Minnesota, (has the majority of
Somalia refugees and a Senator who took his oath and placed his hand on the
Quran refused the Bible.) New York, California, Colorado for examples of the
immigration resettlement program, and very soon coming to your State. Over 90% of them are illiterate and in need
of public assistance. Have you been to Paris or Sweden recently? Immigration is
bankrupting much of Europe.
I have no problem with the “peaceful Muslims” that wants to
integrate into our culture and follow our laws.
The problem lies in that the
militant Muslims dominate the peaceful ones and eventually wants to force Islam
and Sharia law upon us all. They agitate and campaign to dominate the
rest. Why should America be forced into adapting to their culture? They
must adapt to our culture. The Boston bombers were motivated by extreme
militant Islamic beliefs. Our mainstream news is in denial of the danger of
understating the issue of the Muslim/Islam problem in America today. Many of the Mosques are breeding grounds for
home grown terrorists. Today in our
prisons over 18% of the prison population are being converted to Islam by
recruitment by extremists. Islam berg,
in New York is a breeding ground for over 30 militant training compounds in
America today.
The media has yet to uncover the truth. For the truth is
that there are no so called “moderate” Muslims. “Islam is one religion
following Koran and Sunna” I have also read the Koran cover to cover. It is not
a peaceful religion as they would have you believe.
Sad to say, they are making inroads into every facet of our
lives and trying to change our culture, under the guise of the first
amendment. Already, they are changing
our schools, universities, cities, towns and even our own government has been
infiltrated. They want Sharia law and
will stop at nothing to see that it happens. School textbooks are being changed
to put Islam in a more favorable light.
Have you been to a school board meeting recently? Food menus are being
changed to accommodate all of them.
The Saudis “oil money” contributes to schools, universities
and politicians so they can put Islam in a more favorable light in America. Their intent is to destroy us from within,
not by “war” but rather by stealth jihad and intentional deception and front
organizations like “CAIR” who support Hamas. They are gradually succeeding
folks. There are now over 50 Islamic organizations within our own borders.
Concessions made to Muslims are growing everyday in America. You are just not
aware or do not care. Recently, in a Catholic University, a group of Muslims is
suing for discriminating against them
for not allowing them to “pray” in a room without a crucifixion, how absurd,
let them go elsewhere.
When Jews, Christians, Priests, Infidels are being
slaughtered and murdered, and churches are being burned down did you ever
wonder why the so called peaceful moderate Muslims, never speak out against
these atrocities? Europe is losing the battle and America in less than a
generation will be next. Where is the
condemnation from the nearly 3 Million Muslims that are here, have you heard a
word from them? Their silence speaks volumes on their real intent to destroy us
from within and have no intention of ever living within our culture. They want Sharia law in America today
folks, and they will not rest until they achieve that goal.. They want to wage
war against freedom and democracy and have America continue to make concessions
for them. You give them “one inch” and
they will take a mile in support of their goals to establish Islam as the
dominate religion in America and for the eventual mandate for Sharia law to
take over our court system.
Sharia law is a real threat to America’s freedom folks. They
just accomplished that fact, in England this week. We can learn a lot from just
watching what is taking place in London.
Islam is a political
ideology; it is the antithesis of a free society. One generation of silence on the issue due to
political correctness is all it takes.
What you do today and tomorrow will affect your children and
grandchildren and future generations of
America, yet unborn, you have a
responsibility toward them.. Stand
up and be counted to defeat this real threat from within. Voice your opinion, let your congressmen,
senators and school boards know how you feel on the issue. Our freedom and
liberty is at stake, be part of the solution folks.
Forget about being
labeled and simply do what is right for America. We need a permanent solution, time is running
out. Let us not become the next Europe. As for me I refuse to be silent on the
issue. One person can make a difference,
but think if were united, what a difference we can make to turn back the tide
and doctrine of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Enough is enough folks, if you do just one thing today, Google
“TheProjectMuslimBrotherhood” and see for yourself their intent to destroy
America from within. Thank you, and
please forward this to millions. Let me know your opinions.
littlenan says
And they believe THEY hold the high ground!! What world are they living in?!!
These atrocities go on and on and still our cowardly politicians keep crawling to the members of this evil cult. The Qur’an is not a kindly, peaceful book and does not teach kindly, peaceful things.
Isabel Kilian says
Most holy Martyr Mary! Pray for us! The demons are agitated. As Pope Benedict said, have many children so they can fight by your side.
Elvin Muratovic says
Alright these are not muslims, these are radicals. do not say islam is evil, no where does it say to kill people in the name of god no where does it say you get 72 virgins stop believing in what the media tells you, these people are not muslims, we do not rape. these are sick people who use islam as a excuse, islam is not for killers is for those who want to use it as a escape goat to say it was because of my religion do some research on islam before saying its evil, the people themselves are evil within the religion and everyone has those christians jews and buddist. All we do is seperate when we should join together
LittleRedRidingHood says
That old nutshell. You obviously think people cannot read. It’s all there, in black and white, your quran….. Oh and 1400 bloody years of history. The word conquest crops up a lot in history surrounding Islam
Nagwa T. Rizk says
I am one of those Copts living in Egypt. Thank you for making our feeble voice heard.
Lara N says
What a shame! When will this end?
mollysdad says
It will end when they do to the Muslims what they did centuries ago in the Balkans. Kill a third. Expel a third. Convert a third.
John says
May Christ rest her soul in everlasting peace and may her intercession be a fortification to all of us. Axios Axios Axios (Worthy) o Mary the Martyr.
Ross A Lloyd says
Anyone who comments on crimes like this to criticize the perpetrators is immediately labelled as an anti-Islamic extremist by the media…
Ross A Lloyd says
Islam is THE crime against humanity!
Thomas Joseph says
Definition of a martyr: somebody who suffers persecution and death for advocating, renouncing, refusing to renounce, and/or refusing to advocate a belief or cause, usually a religious one.
Muslims call themselves martyrs when THEY THEMSELVES commit suicide to kill others whose beliefs they do not agree with. I have not heard of one case (maybe the Bosnian War?) in modern times of a true Muslim martyr. Their use of the word is an insult to those victims who truly and innocently died for their beliefs, at the hands of evil. Ironically, evil Muslims are guilty of rampantly martyring Christians and Jews. There are good Muslims to be sure, but the religion is trash, founded by a blood-thirsty warlord, and the ignorance that his religion was founded with as a “me too” competitor to Christianity has stayed through the ages. We are fools to stand for this.
Christians who live in Muslim controlled places are fools. Get your children and MOVE! Christians who let Muslims proliferate in countries that Christians control are fools as well. Keep them OUT. Let them live in their dusty barren corner of the world, but nowhere else.
Larry says
YO ALL YOU HOMERITES!
Because of what the Greeks & the Romans did to Palestine, the Jews of Arabia set about creating a force that would attack their enemies.
MOHAMMED’S MOTHER WAS JEWISH!
THIS MAKES HIM A JEW
HIS TRIBE WAS JEWISH ARAB
MOHAMMED BASED HIS QURAN ON THE JEWISH TORAH/TALMUD
ISLAM IS A SECT OF TALMUDIC JUDAISM?
The Mother of Mohammed, Amina was of Jewish birth. Von Hammer.
“Mohammed, who was the only son of Abdallah, a Pagan, and Amina, a Jewess, and was descended from the noble but impoverished family of Hashim, of the priestly tribe of Koreish, who were the chiefs and keepers of the national sanctuary of the Kaaba, and pretended to trace their origin to Ismael, the son of Abraham and Hagar, was born at Mecca, August 20, A.D. 570 …’
At that period, there were many “Jews’ in that area. Again from The History Of The Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire by Edward Gibbon, volume 5, page 202:
“Seven hundred years before the death of Mahomet the Jews were settled in Arabia; and a far greater multitude was expelled from the Holy Land in the wars of Titus and Hadrian. The industrious exiles aspired to liberty and power: they erected synagogues in the cities, and castles in the wilderness; and their Gentile converts were confounded with the children of Israel [Jews]…”
Waves of Israelites to Arabia bringing Judaism in various stages of development
The traditional view of Arabian history centers on Yemen.
It is assumed that a fairly developed civilization grew in the south of the Arabian Peninsula. For several hundred years it grew rich by exporting gold, frankincense and myrrh to the Roman Empire; as well as controlling the overland routes to India and the East. The first collapse of the Marib dam around 450 CE; the decline of the use of frankincense due to the Christianization of Rome; and the Rome success bypassing the desert by using a sea route led to the collapse of southern Arabian society. This in turn led to waves of immigration from the South to North, from the city to the desert.
Dr. Günter Lüling proposes an alternative paradigm.[1] He proposes a “more historical picture of Central Arabia, inundated throughout a millennium by heretical Israelites”. He envisions waves of Israelite refugees headed, North to South, to Arabia bringing with them Judaism in various stages of development. Linguistic and literary-historical research in the Qur’an tends to support the notion of a more northerly origin for linguistic development of Arabic.[2] Here is a brief summary of three of these waves of Judaic immigration: Herodian, Sadducean and Zealot (explained in more detail elsewhere).[3]
During the time of Ptolemy, the native population of Cush originally inhabited both sides of the Red Sea: on the east, southern and eastern Arabia; and on the west, Abyssinia (Ethiopia-Eritrea). During the reign of Ptolemy VI Philometor (r 181–145 BCE), the Jewish High Priest Onias IV built a Jewish Temple in Heliopolis, Egypt and
also one in Mecca, Arabia. He did this to fulfill his understanding of the prophecy
of Isaiah 19:19, “In that day shall there be an altar to the Lord (Heliopolis) in the midst of the land of Egypt, and a pillar at the border (Mecca) thereof to the Lord.” The border of Ptolemy’s empire was in Arabia.
The first wave of immigrants came with the success of the Maccabean, later Herodian, Judeo-Arab kingdom.
Romanized Arabs (and Jews) from the trans-Jordan began migrating southward. The
Tobiads which briefly had controlled Jerusalem extended their power southward from Petra and established the “Tubba” dynasty of kings of Himyar. Yathrib was settled during this period.
The second wave of immigrants came before the destruction of the Temple, when
refugees fleeing the war, as well as the Sadducean leadership, fled to Arabia. Khaibar was established as a city of Sadducean Cohen-Priests at this time.
The third wave of immigrants were mostly refugees and soldiers from Bar Kochba’s revolt – fighters trained in the art of war and zealously nationalistic – sought refugee in Arabia.
This last wave of immigrants included people who are known in Islamic literature as the Aus and the Khazraj. Around 300 CE, they were forced out of Syria by the rising strength of Christian Rome, and the adoption of the Ghassan leader, Harith I, of Christianity. At first the Aus and Khazraj lived on the outskirts of Yathrib. According to Islamic sources, the Khazraj, headed by Malik ibn Ajlan, sought and obtained military assistance from the Bani Ghasaan; and having enticed the principal chiefs of Yathrib into an enclosed tent, massacred them.[4] Then the citizens of Yathrib, beguiled into security by a treacherous peace, attended a feast given by their unprincipled foes; and there a second butchery took place, in which they lost the whole of their leaders.[5]
REFERENCES:
1.”A new Paradigm for the Rise of Islam and its Consequences for a New Paradigm of the History of Israel” by Dr. Günter Lüling; Originally appeared in The Journal of Higher Criticism Nr. 7/1, Spring 2000, pp. 23-53.
2.Hagarism, Crone and Cook
3.See the authors essays “The Prophet Muhammed as a descendant of Onias III” and “From Bar Kochba to the Prophet Muhammed”
4.See Katib at Wackidi, p. 287.
5. “Life of Mohamet I”, by Sir Walter Muir, Chapter III, Section 6
KAABA BUILT BY JEWS
The Persian conquest of Jerusalem in 614CE compared with Islamic conquest of 638CE.
Its Messianic nature and the role of the Jewish Exilarch
By Ben
Abrahamson and Joseph Katz
Upon the overthrow of the revolt and interruption of communication with Israel,
Hananiah set about arranging the calendar, which hitherto had been the exclusive prerogative of the Israeli patriarch. Hananiah even considered the possibility of erecting a Jewish Temple in Nehardea, similar to the ones Onias IV had erected in Heliopolis in Egypt, and in Mecca in Arabia.59 The former had been closed up by the Romans; the later had fallen into idol worship and superstition. Fearing that Babylon may fall the way of Arabia, the Israeli authorities replied:
“If you persist in your intention, seek for yourselves another hill, where Ahijah [the Exilarch] can build you another temple, where Hananiah can play the harp for you [he was a Levite, who were the musicians of the Temple], and confess openly that you have no more share in Israel’s God.”60 This episode made such a strong impression upon the public mind that there are several accounts of it.61
59 See the Author’s essay on “The Prophet Muhammed as a descendant of Onias III”
These two temples were built about the time that Judah the Maccabee rededicated the Temple in Jerusalem. This could explain the Hadith where is says they were built forty years apart:
“Narrated Abu Dhaar: I said, “O Allah’s Apostle!
Which mosque was built first?” He replied, “Al-Masjid-ul-Haram.”
I asked, “Which (was built) next?” He replied,
“Al-Masjid-ul-Aqs-a (i.e. Jerusalem).”
I asked, “What was the period in between them?” He replied,
“Forty (years).” He then added, “Wherever the time for the
prayer comes upon you, perform the prayer, for all the earth is a place of
worshipping for you.” Sahih Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 55, Number 636
Robin Rosenblatt says
There is no place for Islam in our contemporary World.
This conflict is an Islamic Cultural War.
Islamic Culture must destroy Western Culture or Western Culture
must destroy Islamic Culture. It is a Genocidal War. Or we must change their culture.
There is no other choice.
Muhammad Islamic Culture = Evil ::
Western Culture = Civilization
Choose: Freedom or Slavery
Leadership of Great Britain are
Cowards just like the America Government
This Conflict is an Islamic Cultural War
Choose: Freedom or Slavery
marla1 says
But Americans know what they are and don’t have the balls or the brains to kill evey f—ing muslim in America under the guise of being Christians!! Then die you hypercrits and watch it happen to your children or grandchildren!!1
LittleRedRidingHood says
I think repatriation from the back of a hercules transport plane in the middle of the night over saudi would work. Parachute included