Along with Islamic doctrine and history, one can now add science to the list of things that demonstrate Islamic aggression.
Ancestry.com, a company that operates a network of genealogical and historical records, and provides DNA ancestry kits, recently asserted what history already knows: most of the denizens of Turkey are not Turks but rather the descendants of Christian peoples, mostly Greeks, who lived in Anatolia well over a millennium before the Turks invaded, but converted, due to Islam’s three choices (conversion, jizya/submission, or death).
As might be expected, many Turks, who tend to be zealous over their heritage, are outraged at finding that their ancestors were not conquering Turks but conquered infidels. This finding also underscores a vicious cycle I’ve discussed before: most of those Muslims who today persecute the indigenous Christians in their midst—and Turks rank among them—are themselves the descendants of Christians who converted to Islam to cease their own persecution.
One wonders how long before DNA studies reveal another, even more unflattering fact: the bloodline of conquering Muslims—Turks chief among them—is further adulterated with the blood of European concubines, sex-slaves, many millions of which were imported over the centuries by Turks, Tatars, Barbary corsairs, and various other Muslim peoples. The historical record is clear on this.
As one example, in 1438, Bartolomeo de Giano, an Italian Franciscan, witnessed the Turks’ slave raids throughout the Balkans. From Hungary, 300,000 were enslaved and “carried off in just a few days,” he wrote; from Serbia and Transylvania 100,000 were “led away in iron fetters tied to the backs of horses. . . . [and] women and children were herded by dogs without any mercy or piety. If one of them slowed down, unable to walk further because of thirst or pain, O Good Jesus! she immediately ended her life there in torment, cut in half.”
As one historian observes, “The massive enslavement of slavic populations during this period gave rise, in fact, to our word ‘slave’: in Bartolomeo’s time, to be a slave was to be a Slav.”
Similarly, the Greek historian, Doukas (1400-1462), writes the following about the palace of Ottoman sultan Bayezid:
[T]here one could find carefully selected boys and girls, with beautiful faces, sweet young boys and girls who shone more brightly than the sun. To what nations did they belong? They were Byzantines [Greeks], Serbs, Wallachians, Albanians, Hungarians, Saxons, Bulgarians, and Latins…. He himself [Sultan Bayezid] unceasingly gave himself over to pleasure, to the point of exhaustion, by indulging in debauchery with these boys and girls.
Nor, as some of these passages suggest, were European slaves used only for pleasure; Muslims regularly procreated with them as well. Even that one Turk most celebrated by Erdogan’s Turkey—Bayezid’s great-grandson, Muhammad II, the conqueror of Constantinople—was born of a Christian slave mother. This did not change the fact that he became an avowed enemy of Christendom—the “forerunner of antichrist” as he was described.
Moreover, as Darío Fernández-Morera, author of The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise, explains:
Such was the impact of Christian slaves on Islamic lands, that many of the Umayyad rulers of Islamic Spain, as the sons of sexual slaves, were blue-eyed and blond or red-haired; and the founder of the “Arabic” Nasrid dynasty of Granada was called al-Hamar, “the Red One,” because of his reddish hair and beard. … Arabist Celia del Moral observes that in Umayyad al-Andalus the most coveted and therefore expensive sexual slaves were blond and red-haired females from the Northern Christian regions.
In fact, according to the calculations of Spanish Arabist Julian Ribera, due to the constant sexual intercourse with European slave women, the genetic Arab component of each generation of Umayyad rulers was reduced by half, so that the last Umayyad, Hisham II (976-1013), was approximately only 0.09 percent Arab.
Nor was this phenomenon limited to Muslim elites—caliphs, sultans, emirs, and the like—because they could afford “well-staffed” harems. Naturally, it is they whose doings are recorded, because it is they—the rulers, not the lay Muslim—that chroniclers recorded. Even so, history makes clear that European sex-slaves were, depending on time and place, abundantly available to the average Muslim.
Thus we learn that the slave markets of Adrianople (Edirne), formerly the Ottoman capital, were so inundated with European flesh that children sold for pennies, “a very beautiful slave woman was exchanged for a pair of boots, and four Serbian slaves were traded for a horse.”
Similarly, considering that sixteenth century “Algiers teemed with Christian captives, and it became a common saying that a Christian slave was scarce a fair barter for an onion,” little wonder by the late eighteenth century, European observers noted how “the inhabitants of Algiers have a rather white complexion.”
Will Ancestry.com or similar organizations ever demonstrate this other unflattering fact concerning Muslim bloodlines through DNA? Unlikely.
Quoted material in the above article was excerpted from and is documented in the author’s book, Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West.
Auriell Cerith says
lol
well well so wht does this mean does it men thgt folks are easily played I mean your folks are Christian but ure a savage Muslim how does that work as it men or was it everybody that just took the religion up and became Muslim I find people so disappointing mind you this is from perspective of being an English person in Australia a brilliant life that would not know how to deal with a Muslim takeover wouldn’t couldn’t be a good slavbe i would probably be killed lol
nreally good article Raymond thank you for you hard work you do it very well
Erica Ling says
The whole ethos of Islam is CONQUEST. The Quran orders the Muslim to “bring the Infidel to Allah”, hence the aggression, the entitlement, the savagery. The Ambassador of Tunisia, to Jefferson, when asked why they warred against peaceful nations. “It was founded on the laws of their prophet; it was written in the Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners; that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners. And that every Musselman who should be slain in battle was assured of a place in Paradise.”
Tershia says
What a terrible disappointment awaits them! Their paradise is going to be hell-hot 🔥.
Santanu Goswami says
Every ambitious politician projected that warring for them would lead to heaven. Read Indian Gita
331331ua says
Excellent post Raymond! I will have to bring that up with the next patriotic Turk I meet.
Shony says
I already knew about that but I hope more and more genetic tests show these Muslims who they really are. I guess to the majority this won’t change much but at least some will get the reasons why they’re mostly European in blood …
Some have already woken up to their true Armenian ancestry, let’s wait and see what will happen to those who realize they’re barely Turkic in terms of ethnicity.
Thanks for this excellent article, Mr. Ibrahim, sharing as usual.
Mary Alafouzo says
Will they ever allow themselves to believe, as demonstrated by European scientists over 150 years until the 19thc., that egg and sperm are equivalent and that heredity has a biological content that is inherited and contained in both egg and sperm – coming from a religion whose Koran states categorically that “Men have authority over women because Allah has made one superior to the other”, let alone that he is allowed to ‘beat’ her if she disobeys him (Koran:Dawood, 4:34) (Matthew Cobb, The Egg and Sperm Race, 2007). Thank you Raymond Ibrahim for another brilliant article.
Don Gaetano says
Hi Mary, Interesting scientific points among these posts. Personally, I don’t think anything like this would affect our friends much, only my opinion of course.
They only know one thing, genetically pure or not, Allah is their God and Mohammad is his prophet. The words of the Koran and are all sacred and must be followed.
As someone commented here, and we all know, all infidels must be subdued and ruled and converted or killed. Period.
Any infidel, male or female, young or old, is fair game for slavery, sexually, as laborers, forced fighters, academics, etc.
Infidels, have a standing not much higher that animals, our friends are the superiors.
The only thing that will stop this bunch is overwhelming force, nothing else (divine intervention of course but God allows us these trials so not likely).
Half way through Alinsky’s, “Rules for Radicals”. He sees the normal back and forth tension between our two party system here in US as a life and death struggle against a mortal enemy. Therefore, any and all means can be used toward the desired ends, which are full control, enforced by strict rules and violence if necessary.
He romanticizes revolution and talks as the only savior of society, he and his elite group of revolutionaries who will fight corruption and set the captives free – like Castro did. Cuba a grand example of this thinking.
Our friends are now in the colleges, setting up tables with pleasant young men talking to wide eyed, naive students hanging on every word of propaganda.
That’s the latest, reading “A Sword Over the Nile” slowly, amazing book.
Stay well
Mary Alafouzo says
To Don: I agree that the only thing that will stop them is overwhelming force. That’s the only thing they respect!
Demolay says
There are several academic articles revealing those so called DNA ancestry tests are not “scientific” but a succesful commercial product… Genetic classification of human groups according to “nation” brands, is an idiotic attempt, that’s why it is so popular as a commercial product..
Joey Tickle says
This information would answer the question, raised in my mind, why do peoples in in
Balkan region , seem to have ties and favor the Turkish peoples. Example, many Albanians
travel and holiday there. Though it is a beautiful place, they seem to have a connection with the people.
Regards
Joey T.
Tershia says
In contrast to what God teaches and intends for love and pleasure between married couples, Allah is all about self-serving ugly and violent sex.
They just can’t keep it in their pants – or under their thobe/kameez.
Don Gaetano says
Ouch, right to the point T. The whole system is violent, can’t say every one practicing it but as I often say – far too many indulge.
Stay well
Mary Alafouzo says
How can they Tershia? They criticise us but they can’t see that they’ve turned even Paradise into a public brothel.
Erin Eldridge says
I just feel so angry when I read about this and my heart bleeds for those young men, women, and children who were torn from their loved ones and must have had their lives ruined by the barbarism of sexual slavery. It’s a horror story. Great article. Thank you, Raymond.
Don Gaetano says
Thanks Erin for thinking of and voicing you deep concern for the victims. It’s something I have an awareness frequently and talk about, always aware actually but we have to accept what we can’t change immediately and continue to find ways to get the word out.
My latest strategy is to petition retired military and journalists to go public with this message of warning.
Best to you
EmeraldCityNotebook says
Petition is a great idea. How are you going about it?
AlgorithmicAnalyst says
Excellent use of the early sources.
I’ve noticed that early sources are sometimes more honest in their descriptions.
Krishna says
Same thing with Pakistanis they deslike being associated with Indian blood instead they think are descendents of Arabs or imaginary blue eyed afghans
Caballero Templario says
I am from Mexico and in this country unlike the United States, Canada, and several European and Western Mexico, a population of Muslims that does not exceed 8000 in more than 130 million and I think they are less fervent than their African, Asian and Asian counterparts. Europeans and the influence is very weak here and it is recorded that in the following decades they will not grow almost nothing, but returning to the subject of this article, I admire you a lot Raymond I have read for a few years your articles full of scientific and historical analysis and the truth both of the false prophet Muhammed and the false and dangerous Islamic “religion”, it makes me very angry like you but at the same time a lot of sadness and sorrow because many Muslims of good will sincerely believe in beautiful lies about their own faith and have a false and wrong perspective both of Jesus Christ, the Virgin Mary and of our Father God Yahve who is not the same as that pagan Arab idol ala the great one, from my heart it makes me want to go to evangelize the countries se Arab Muslims and at the same time preach with respect and cordiality but with firmness and exact knowledge of the truth of Islam without caring that I am martyred here or in some European country
HugoHackenbush says
The Turks doth protest too much.
I am assuming that the analysis centered on mitochondrial DNA which comes only from the mother via the egg cytoplasm (except in very rare chimeric circumstances where a sperm mitochondrion manages to survive and reproduce at each cell division). Mitochondrial DNA establishes maternity in an absolute sense so it is doubtful that females of Greek Christian descent had a choice in whether or not to accept a DNA donation from (literally) invading males
Dicky says
These radicals are sorely mistaken with these stupid notions. Think of the” millions” of people in the U.S. who truly love their freedom and do actually know what that means.
Reth says
science demonstrates