In 2012 in Pakistan, as Christian children were singing carols inside their church, Muslim men from a nearby mosque barged in with an axe, destroyed the furniture, desecrated the altar, and beat the children. Their justification for such violence? “You are disturbing our prayers…. How dare you use the mike and speakers?”
Welcome to the true face of “Muslim grievance”—what I call the “how dare you?!” phenomenon. Remember it next time “progressive” media and politicians tell you that Muslim terrorism—whether the 9/11 strikes, Fort Hood Massacre, Boston Bombing, or recent London Beheading—are products of grievances against the West. Missing from their analyses is the supremacist nature of Muslim grievances.
The Conditions of Omar, a foundational medieval Muslim text, mandates this sense of superiority over non-Muslims. Among other stipulations, the Conditions commands conquered Christians not to raise their “voices during prayer or readings in churches anywhere near Muslims” (hence the axe-attack in Pakistan). It also commands them not to display any signs of Christianity—specifically Bibles and crosses—not to build churches, and not to criticize the prophet.
If the supremacist nature of Islamic law is still not clear enough, the Conditions literally command Christians to give up their seats to Muslims on demand.
By analogy, consider when black Rosa Parks refused to give up her bus seat to white passengers in a white supremacist environment. Sincere grievances arose: how dare she think herself our equal?
But were such grievances legitimate? Should they have been accommodated?
In my new book, Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians, I document hundreds of attacks on Christians. In most cases, the Muslim attackers are truly aggrieved.
For example, in 2007 in Turkey, a publishing house distributing Bibles was stormed and three of its Christian employees tortured, disemboweled, and finally murdered. One suspect later said: “We didn’t do this for ourselves, but for our religion [Islam]…. Our religion is being destroyed.”
Similarly, in 2011 in Egypt, after a 17-year-old Christian student refused to obey his Muslim teacher’s orders to cover up his cross, the teacher and some Muslim students attacked, beat, and ultimately murdered the Christian teenager.
These Turkish and Egyptian murderers were truly aggrieved: the Conditions clearly state that Christians must not “produce a cross or Bible” around Muslims. How dare the Egyptian student and Turkish Bible publishers refuse to comply?
In Indonesia, where it is becoming next to impossible for Christians to build churches, Christians congregated to celebrate Christmas, 2012, on empty land where they hoped to build a church—only to be attacked by Muslims who hurled cow dung and bags of urine at the Christians as they prayed.
These Muslims were also sincerely aggrieved: how dare these Christians think they can build a church when the Conditions forbid it? (See Crucified Again for a new translation of “The Conditions of Omar.)
Weeks ago in Pakistan, after a Christian man was accused of insulting Muslim prophet Muhammad—another big no-no according to the Conditions—3,000 Muslims burned down two churches and some 200 Christian homes.
Take a look at their pictures; these are undoubtedly people with a “grievance.”
Most recently in Pakistan, when a Muslim slapped a Christian and the latter reciprocated, the Muslim exclaimed “How dare a Christian slap me?” Anti-Christian violence immediately commenced.
In short, anytime non-Muslims dare to overstep their Sharia-designated “inferior” status, supremacist Muslims become violently aggrieved.
From here, one can begin to understand the ultimate Muslim grievance: Israel.
For if “infidel” Christians are deemed inferior and attacked by aggrieved Muslims for exercising their basic human rights, like freedom of worship, how must Muslims feel about Jews—the descendants of pigs and apes, according to the Koran—exercising power and authority over fellow Muslims in what is perceived to be Muslim land?
How dare they?!
Of course, if grievances against Israel were really about justice and displaced Palestinians, Muslims—and their Western appeasers—would be aggrieved by the fact that millions of Christians are currently being displaced by Muslim invaders.
Needless to say, they are not.
So the next time you hear that Muslim rage and terrorism are products of grievance, remember that this is absolutely true. But these “grievances” are not predicated on any universal standards of equality or justice, only a supremacist worldview.
Christians Should Start Attacking And Killing As Many Of Muslims As Possible Regain Our Place In Our Own Society
No Christians should NOT do that.
This isn’t a gang war and our gang isn’t called “the Christians”.
I know that I am a Christian because I follow the commandments of the Lord. I’ll turn the other cheek. I’ll love my enemy. I won’t live by the sword.
Don’t let others evil turn you into another kind of evil my friend.
Sell your coat, buy a sword.
The Lord Christ gave us a much higher standard than that.
Nope.
Jesus did not teach people to turn the other cheek when a sword is being swung at your neck
You can love your enemy and kill them in multitudes. They live by the sword, they must also die by the sword or there will be no Jesus anymore. Just Isa.
smarten up
Jesus did indeed teach to turn the other cheek which is a hard saying. Jesus had many hard sayings. His disciples went willingly to their deaths.
It just depends how far you are in your Journey. I’m at the point that if my time has come then it’s come. But you shouldn’t theologize around things in order to get the results that you’re looking for.
Jesus is truth and eternal. There is nothing that Islam can do that would make Him disappear. They kill people, not God and not His Church.
And I have smartened up. I smartened up 6 years ago when Christ pulled me out of the violence and hatred of my life which allowed me to see what i couldn’t see before.
I don’t claim to be a brilliant person. Just someone who takes the teachings of the Lord to heart and trust. I’ve seen more hearts changed because they’ve seen innocent people die by the hands of evil men than the opposite.
I just think you and I are just not at the same place.
Much respect
Evan
“His disciples went willingly to their deaths.”
NO. You confuse willing with accepting.
“They kill people”
Once all Christians and especially Jews are gone, the Bible becomes literal myth. All that will be left is the quranic version and Isa.
I think that you don’t consider history. When Hitler himself had wished that Charles Martel had lost so that the whole of Europe had been Islamicised rather than Christianized, you need to take your own step back and look at the big picture.
Do you really believe that people should just submit to islam? Should everyone be a shriveling dhimmi coward like you? Should we just offer up our women and children for sex slavery while the men just kneel down and allow the swords of jihad to take their heads?
You and I are on different levels and won’t understand eachother friend. I didn’t insult you but you insult me. I think it’s fruitless for us to continue.
You don’t seem to understand what i’m trying to say and that might just be my fault. In the end nothing beats a face to face conversation. These internet conversations I’ve never found too fulfilling anyway lol.
Take care of yourself Van. All my best
Evan
Yeah, don’t get caught with your neck out.
STOP THE BULL SHIT!
TALMUDIC JUDAISM – CHRISTENDOM – MOHAMMEDANISM, THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF THE DEAD!
HUMAN SACRIFICES WERE OFFERED ON MOUNT SINAI BY AARON, TO MOLOCH (EXODUS 32).
UP
& UNTIL THEIR TRIP TO BABYLON, JEWS OFFERED HUMAN SACRIFICES (1
KINGS 11:1-13; AMOS 5:25-27; ACTS 7:42-43). AND IF YOU GOOGLE THE
BABYLONIAN JEWISH TALMUD, SANHEDRIN 64 a-b, YOU WILL READ HOW JEWS ARE
TAUGHT HOW TO OFFER HUMAN SACRIFICES TO MOLOCH & NOT BE GUILTY! THE
TRICK IS TO GET SOMEONE TO DO THE HOLOCAUST!
Lev 27:28-29.
MISHNAH. HE WHO GIVES OF HIS SEED TO MOLECH
INCURS NO PUNISHMENT UNLESS HE DELIVERS IT TO MOLECH AND CAUSES IT TO PASS
THROUGH THE FIRE. IF HE GAVE IT TO MOLECH BUT DID NOT CAUSE IT TO PASS THROUGH
THE FIRE, OR THE REVERSE, HE INCURS NO PENALTY, UNLESS HE DOES BOTH.
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 64a
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 437
Following the Mishnah is a discussion among the sages. One of the Talmud Sages,
Rabbi Ashi, comments as follows:
GEMARA. R. Ashi propounded: What if one caused his blind or sleeping son to
pass through, (3) or if he caused his grandson by his son or daughter to pass
through? — One at least of these you may solve. For it has been taught: [Any
men … that giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall he put to death …
And I will set my face against that man, and will cut him off from among his people;] because he hath given of his seed unto Molech. Why is
this stated? — Because it is said, there shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire. From this I know
it only of his son or daughter. Whence do I know that it applies to his son’s
son or daughter’s son too? From the verse, [And if the people of the land do
any ways hide their eyes from the man] when he giveth of his seed unto Molech
[and kill him not: Then I will … cut him off.]
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 64b
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 439
Rabbi Dr. Freedman, one of the translators of the Soncino Tractate Sanhedrin,
clarifies the passage. In a footnote, Rabbi Dr. Freedman confirms that the
Talmud Sages use “seed” to denote living children, in the same sense as the Biblical translators understand the term in the above
Biblical quotes. In this footnote, Rabbi Dr. Freedman paraphrases the question
from Rabbi Ashi:
3. Is ‘thou shalt not cause to pass’ applicable only to a son who can naturally
pass through himself, but not to a blind or sleeping son, who must be led or carried,
or does it apply to all?
Rabbi Dr. Freedman
Other footnotes within the same context clarify the fine point of distinction
being drawn in the Mishnah and subsequent debates among the sages:
5. Lev. XVIII, 21. This proves that the offence consists of two parts; (I)
formal delivery to the priests, and (2) causing the seed to pass through the
fire.
Rabbi Dr. Freedman (2)
5. As two separate offences, proving that giving one’s seed to Molech is not
idolatry. The differences [sic] is, that if one sacrificed to Molech, or caused
his son to pass through the fire to some other deity, he is not punished.
Rabbi Dr. Freedman (3)
Following the Mishnah, Sanhedrin 64a and 64b contain a rousing debate between
the Sages concerning:
* the circumstances under which worshipping an idol is idolatry,
* which idols may be worshipped without indulging in
idolatry,
* which parts of child sacrifice in what combination are punishable, and
* how children may be sacrificed without violating Leviticus.
YO EVAN,
AND HE ALSO SAID HE WAS RETURNING QUICKLY!
AND DON’T USE THE BS VERSE OF 2 PETER 3:8 AS AN EXCUSE FOR HIS DELAY, BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO USE THE SAME STANDARD FOR THE 7 DAY CREATION OF GENESIS.
JESUS OF NAZARETH WAS A PROPHET OF NAZARETH, WHICH ROMANISM MADE A GOD!
THE SERMON ON THE MOUNT HAS BEEN EXCUSED BECAUSE OF ROMANISM!
Stick to the standards of humanity! This is the problem – all this damned religion!
There is no such thing as “standards of humanity”. Humanistic standards vary depending on what philosophy someone uses. Some are peaceful. Some are insanely violent.
C’mon Hardworker50. Even when I was a nihilist i wouldn’t shoot a statement like that.
I’d even ask what is religion and what isn’t? You have foundational beliefs on how things should be. Because you don’t put them in a box that you’ve labeled “religion”, it doesn’t make your beliefs valid. No doubt your personal beliefs have come to a head with another persons personal beliefs even if that person isn’t of “religious” inclinations either. You teach or will teach your kids your ethics. How is that not religious? Your child’s ethics will contradict another childs ethics.
That i put my trust in a person who as far as I’m concerned had authority when He spoke. That what He said was the way to live. How is that wrong? How is that wrong compared to you telling others what you think things aught to be like?
We all follow someone. I chose to follow someone that I can trust.
Cheers 🙂
Religion is certainly not a concept with any standards for humanity, as it is first based on fantasy and not fact ; a God? When you have brought your proof to the table you can have a ticket to give an opinion, and then you can spout off the christian platitudes; until then there is absolutely no credibility in any religious statements – they are opinion only! and yes the standards are called the Universal Declaration of Human Rights – the best at the moment.
No doubt if there were no proof to believe in Christianity then it would be lunacy. But that i shouldn’t have given an opinion unless i would have written an extensive article on it without anyone having asked? why? You haven’t offered any proof for any of your beliefs. Shouldn’t your opinions be suppressed too? You believe the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is valid. You have no evidence of its validity. It’s opinion. A thorough atheist would agree that it’s nice wishful thinking but it doesn’t hold any more true than eliminating human beings that are unable to properly contribute to society through eugenics. Nobody would be able to say to this logical atheist that he’s wrong.
Because you asked, I have no problem telling you what I’ve seen that took me from a philosophical nihilist to an Orthodox Christian. I don’t think this is the place for it as the topic of the article is for another subject. But, you see my name, private message me on facebook or find me on skype and i’ll tell you my reasons. You can agree or disagree about their validity but at least we can respect eachother. I’ll be totally open.
I have no beef with atheists. In fact I often relate to them and defend criticisms that legitimate and honest atheists make. I haven’t belittled your beliefs and called you a “village atheist” just because you’ve made some logic mistakes. You have my ear and you have my respect.
It’d be nice to hear from you though.
Cheers
and you wonder and complain that people insult you??!!??…
I do not have a ‘belief’ in atheism! I have yet to see any proof for a god – that is A-theism! Not having a belief!
Facebook dude, talk to me on there. I’ll tell you everything and you tell me what you think. I don’t want to bury this comments section with our back and forth.
Agnosticism actually would be something that wouldn’t be a belief since it’s admitting to not knowing and not making a definitive statement. But atheism is indeed a belief. If someone says that subject X is there, says it can show you subject X but you deny that subject X is actually there and dismiss the possibility without being open to hearing and seeing it, then that is a belief and i would even say a dogmatic belief.
So yeah, i’m not a fan when people insult others for any reason, especially because of difference of point of view. Like i said, i haven’t dismissed you, i haven’t mocked you. I want to hear your point of view in detail. You have my full attention. I’d just rather it be privately because i’m not a fan of comments sections on articles being sidetracked by off topic conversations like ours.
YO EVAN,
EVERY COUNTRY HAS A RIGHT TO DEFEND ITSELF!
THAT IS A HUMAN RIGHT!
IT HAS NOTHING GOT TO DO WITH RELIGION!
OUR BODIES ATTACK ENEMY BACTERIA & PARASITES ALL THE TIME!
THAT IS THE LAW OF NATURE!
PUT DOWN YOUR COMIC BOOKS!
MOHAMMEDANISM IS A PARASITE ON THE HOST OF CIVILIZATION!
DESTROY! DESTROY! DESTROY!
Oh wow, hey Larry, I never noticed that you replied. My apologies.
Why mock me though. Actually when i was a Nihilist, i was heavily into comic books. Believe it or not, much of my assumptions of theism was based on the Spawn comic book lol.
So yeah, My opinions come purely as a Christian directed at those who claim to be Christian but push for an ideology that’s anti-Christian. What i said doesn’t make sense and would never apply to someone who isn’t a Christian. You decide what you want to do and how you want to do it. As far as I’m concerned, I trust the Lord in turning the other cheek. I know by experience what that does compared to returning slaughter with slaughter. I don’t speak as a computer philosopher.
As for the points that you wanted to get across about Christianity, your examples seem to be directed towards Protestant ideologies where they take scripture and then after that they decide and decipher and postulate what occurred in the past. I however am an Orthodox Christian whose Tradition goes back to 2000 years ago.
The Orthodox have various opinions of what the Genesis account is and what it says (litteral? allegorical?…) But the Church has no particular stance on it because it doesn’t matter. It has first hand direct contact with God Himself so it really doesn’t care what someone wants to make of Genesis.
My second point is that you said that someone reading for example Second Peter has to take it with the same standard that he takes the book of Genesis. My curiosity on this isn’t “religious” but more of a logic thing. Why would someone read two works, written by two different authors, in two different historical periods, in different contexts, in the same way? That would be like asking to read Fyodor Dostoevsky’s work and interpreting it in the same way as a written letter by Bill Cosby.
Also that argument applies ONLY to sects of Protestantism since it’s in that tradition which is divorced from the historical understanding of Scripture that they try various ways of deciphering and understanding what they’re reading. No different than someone grabbing my families photo album and trying to decipher everything from those glimpses.
For your final point about Romanism having made Jesus into a deity. For this you’d be hard pressed to find historical data to confirm the hypothesis. It’s rather a philosophical deduction what you present which only works on another philosophical PREsupposition.
Rather the opposite happened. You don’t find debates of Christ’s divinity (which would be expected) but rather you see debates on how He could actually also be Man.
To acknowledge this by the way doesn’t mean that you accept that Jesus is God and that you’ll start prostrating before Him or anything. It just means that this is what was going on in His time and that you just disagree with certain philosophical conclusions.
I have no beef with you at all Larry. I too would defend my family and loved ones if anyone would try to kill them. I just won’t go out guessing who’s a threat and attacking them. Not everyone who says they’re a Muslim is actually one at heart and truly a threat.
best wishes to you. Hope your Summer was a good one.
Evan
What about this one Evan:
“Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces.” Matthew 7:6 Islam tramples everything we call holy!
Hey Jeanne!
What of it?? (the verse)
The barbaric muslims are the current-day plague, spreading death and destruction world-wide.
Who said this, to whom, when, why and what have we ever done about it? Would you consider this statement to be contrary to our Constitution, our way of life, a danger to our National and Homeland Security? Would you think these are words of an enemy? Surely, our government has studied this but where is the reports?
“The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the Laws of their prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every musselman [muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
This statement was a part of a March 28, 1786, letter from John Adams and Thomas Jefferson to John Jay, the United States Secretary of Foreign Affairs, Continental Congress, concerning their conversation with the Tripoli ambassador as to why his pirates/terrorists hijacked our merchant ships, stole the ships and cargo while holding the sailors for ransom. (Thomas Jefferson. “The Papers of Thomas Jefferson”. Princeton Univ. Press. pp. 9:358.)
Why are we failing to mention the obvious in the 1786 letter that still exists
today? Here are the main points:
a. “it was founded on the Laws of their prophet”;
b. “that it was written in their Koran”;
c. “that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners”;
d. “that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and”;
e. “to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and”;
f. “that every musselman [muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
Has our government studied this and if they have, where are the published reports?
See actual letter here: http://memory.loc.gov/master/mss/mtj/mtj1/005/0400/0430.jpg
This is the typed version: http://freepages.misc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~argyll/From%20JOHN%20ADAMS%20And%20THOMAS%20JEFFERSON.pdf
Please take the time to read an article by Gerard W. Gawalt, a
manuscript specialist for early American history in the Manuscript Division,
Library of Congress titled, “America and the Barbary Pirates : An International Battle Against an
Unconventional Foe. It can be found at: http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/collections/jefferson_papers/mtjprece.html
Go
online to John Adams Koran: The Koran:
commonly called the Alcoran of Mohomet (1806). Once on the link, look to the
left and link to Read: then to To the
Reader and see what he says about Islam. He didn’t think much of it.
http://archive.org/details/korancommonlycal00john
YO!
STOP THE BS!
ANY COUNTRY THAT WOULD ELECT FOR THEIR PRESIDENT, A WANKER LIKE CLINTON, A DRUNK LIKE BUSH & A FAGGOT LIKE OBAMA, DESERVES TO BE DESTROYED!
VOTE HOMER SIMPSON FOR PRESIDENT!
Clinton is still a wanker, Obama has always been a phaggot, but Bush has been clean for many years. Bush’s “crime” has been to enable Islam (“religion of peace” BS) and to enable the rise of scum like Barry Soetero,
Rules of civilization do not apply to Islam. We have to present a very effective fearful front. Even then it is unlikely that things will calm down. But at least they will be scared.
AMERICA DESERVES TO BE DESTROYED!
YOU BASTARDS HAD EVERY OPPORTUNITY TO BE THE LAND OF THE FREE, BUT YOU ABUSED YOUR PEOPLE & CREATED A NEW NAZI STATE!
GO TO YOU TUBE & TYPE IN, JOHN LOFTUS, AMERICA’S NAZI SECRET.
oooo, a screaming tin hat wearer relying on Youtube… tsk tsk.
As a Christian I am aggrieved that the Moanhabitualins push their blasphemous filth in my face. https://www.flickr.com/photos/54229212@N05/9223414097/in/photostream/lightbox/
YO BIFF,
WHEN YOU SAY YOU ARE A CHRISTIAN, DO YOU BASE YOUR STATEMENT ON MATTHEW CH 5 TO CH 7 & ACTS CH 2?
OR ARE YOU A MEMBER OF CHRISTENDOM?
Harry, shouting isn’t very Christ like. Hmmm, I also like St John 14:6-7.
How would you change or add to the following commentary? Socialism, which will take away our freedom of speech and guns, is being used as a stepping stone to Islamic control, which will prove that socialism was the opium of the people and socialists were the useful idiots for the “oppressed” muslims. There is a great need for a political party that is relevant to the people who have died and are willing to die to restore and preserve constitutional freedom. A knowledge of history and the reading of article V of the U.S. Constitution makes it plain to me that the states own the Constitution and the admendment process. The supreme court (i.e., the federal government, assumed the right to judge the constitutionality of laws and actions. Under the constitution, this should be a function of the state supreme courts. I have heard that a lot changed for the worst after the civil war and admit to being presently uneducated about those changes. I do understand that we do not have a constitution unless a sufficient number of people believe we do and vote accordingly.
YO BILL,
DID YOU EVER READ ACTS 2?
OR WHAT ABOUT:
Matthew 19:16-22
Eternal Life in the Kingdom
16 Then a man came to Jesus and said, “Teacher, what good deed should I do to gain eternal life?”
17 Jesus said to him, “Why do you ask me about what is good? There is only one who is good. If you want to enter into life, obey the commandments.”
18 “Which commandments?” the man asked.
Jesus said, “Never murder. Never commit adultery. Never steal. Never give false testimony. 19 Honor your father and mother. Love your neighbor as you love yourself.”
20 The young man replied, “I have obeyed all these commandments. What else do I need to do?”
21 Jesus said to him, “If you want to be perfect, sell what you own. Give the
money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then follow
me!”
22 When the young man heard this, he went away sad because he owned a lot of property.
//how must Muslims feel about Jews—the descendants of pigs and apes, according to the Koran//
This is a shameful lie .. Koran recognizes and speaks about jews as the descendants of Ibrahim , the twelve tribes(of jews) from the twelve sons of jacob , s/o of Isaac s/o Abraham …. A FEW among them (Bani Israel , as Koran addresses them ) transgressed and as a punishment of their wrong doings , they were converted to monkeys according to koran ..
koran ch: 2 verse 65:
“And certainly you have known those among you who exceeded the limits of the Sabbath, so We said to them: Be (as) apes, despised and hated”
As far as this article is concerned , Saying that Muslims are supermacist , is true only in the sense that every religion in the world is based on the belief of its followers that their religion is the true one . In other words every religious creed is supermacist !! The motivation behind the crusade wars was christian supermacism !! Holy Land held by filthy Muslims !! HOW DARE THEY !!
In Pakistan , Christians are not hated or thought to be inferior because of their religion .. It is their social inferiority as they come from the lowest social class ; sweepers , gutter cleaners are exclusively christian … {Social discrimination is purely a Hindu concept , adapted by local muslims as they have lived with hindus for one thousand years .. islam rejects any social discrimination } .. And The reason behind the lowest social class of India to convert to christianity was the Approach of Christian Missionaries during British rule ; the poor most and the neglected most of any society should be the first ones to be preached ………..
The main Problem is religious intolerance … something no religion ever teaches !! I am not surprised by this attitude of relatively uneducated and illiterate masses of the third world countries because highly educated people are doing no good as well !! spreading hatred and showing equal religious intolerance !! as is evident in this article and many more …… The Americans are killing innocent people including children in Pakistan on daily basis ; so called drone attacks … their president smiles on it and the whole world appreciates him and he gets nominated for the noble prize for PEACE …. And the one who has lost all his family and friends in such attacks , when decides to take revenge , he is a TERRORIST … We seriously need to think over it
You obviously understand nothing about what allah taught in the koran.
YO HOMER,
LOHIT IS SPOT ON ABOUT YOUR PEDOPHILE, SEX MANIAC IDOL CALLED ALLAH!
AND REMEMBER THERE IS ALSO SUNNAH, HADITH & SIRA, WHICH EXPLAINS YOUR CULT OF DEATH!
You seem to think that I am a muslim. Whatever gave you that idea? Nothing could be further from the truth. Perhaps you need to think a little bit more carefully before jumping to conclusions.
While I am at it, here is one of my recent blogs.
http://tamiblog002.wordpress.com/2014/03/07/racism-in-islam/
yes we have taken revenge on muslims. if they would have stayed where they belong an not have attacked us AMERICANS this would not be going on now. and you are terrorist. and savages. and killing all those CHRISTIANS MY GOD WILL PUNISH EACH ONE OF YOU FOR IT.
NO! NO! NO!
THE BRITISH, FRENCH & GERMANS STUCK THEIR NOSES IN THE MIDDLE EAST & HAVE CREATED THE PRESENT PROBLEMS!
READ HISTORY & STOP WATCHING TV.
Maybe you should read up on your history. It was only when western (British, French German and American) military might out matched Islamic military might that Muslims stopped Jihad. They now feel that with the wishy washy left wing moral equivalance of all lifestyles and religions has allowed Muslims to reassert the following of their warlord, pedophile slaver prophet again.
Islam was killing western europeans long before France, Britain, or America were a thing.
Well, who cares about the infidels who convert to christianity for money?
You son of a bitch, what do you even know about Hinduism? Shri Krishna had given the concept of “Vasudaiv Kutumbakam”; the entire world as a single family before any of your child molesting Mohammad (s) was/ were ever born. Hinduism and its concept of saving the mankind was the sole thing that kept India stretched from Afghanistan to Indonesia long before any of you swine Muslims were ever born, which have taught nothing but to “Kill Infidels after holy month passes” (9:5), beating women into submission, killing for 72 fairies in heaven and raping the women and children who were won in a war…For more information, you can even contact me personally..I can provide a set of pictures as to what has your scum tribe been up to since the last six decades in our country or so….
#FuckYouAll..
MOFO when did I even talk about Hinduism .. You are just a brain dead chutiya
YO Muhammad Sarmad Idrees,
THE QUESTION EVERY MOHAMMEDAN MUST ANSWER:
DO MOHAMMEDANS BELIEVE IN SANTA?
SANTA HAS HIS RUDOLPH & MUHAMMAD HAD HIS BURAQ
MUHAMMAD’S NIGHT JOURNEY
No Muslim can deny the importance of Mohammed’s night journey in Islam, because this trip determined the Islamic rituals of praying five times a day, and performing ablution – or washing before prayer. In other words Mohammed’s night journey should impact the lives of 1.5 billion Muslims all over the world – five times – each and every day.
Qur’an, sura 17.1
“Glory to (Allah) Who did take His servant for a Journey by night from the Sacred Mosque to the farthest Mosque, whose precincts We did bless,- in order that We might show him some of Our Signs: for He is the One Who heareth and seeth (all things)”.
Mohammed’s alleged overnight trip covered the 1,000 miles from Mecca to Jerusalem, a trip to heaven, and a return to Mecca by morning, and is described in part as follows:
Sahih Muslim, Book 001, Number 0309:
It is narrated on the authority of Anas b. Malik that the Messenger of Allah
(may peace be upon him) said: I was brought al-Buraq Who is an animal white and long, larger than a donkey but smaller than a mule, who would place his hoof a distance equal to the range of vision. I mounted it and came to the Temple (Bait Maqdis in Jerusalem), then tethered it to the ring used
by the prophets. I entered the mosque and prayed two rak’ahs in it, and then
came out and Gabriel brought me a vessel of wine and a vessel of milk.
So Mohammed flew on al-Buraq to the temple in Jerusalem, tied it up to a ring “the prophets” had used in the past, and went on in to the Temple
to pray. Because of the fantastic nature of Mohammed’s claims, some 21st
century Muslims try to suggest that this was a vision or dream, but according
to perhaps the most highly regarded historian of Islam:
Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 58, Number 228:
Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas:
The sights which Allah’s Apostle was shown on the Night Journey when he was taken to Bait-ul-Maqdis (i.e. Jerusalem) were actual sights, (not dreams). And the Cursed Tree (mentioned) in the Quran is the tree of Zaqqum (itself).
Additionally, the rock enshrined in the Dome of the Rock on the temple mount, is supposed to be where Mohammed and Baraq launched from, for the leg of the trip to heaven. So it would be untenable to suggest that Mohammed’s journey was a dream or vision, while at the same time claiming that he launched from a very much physical and tangible rock, on the temple mount.
ISLAM IS A F–KING JOKE!
The crusades were in retaliation for muslim attacks right across the Mediterranean. You know those arabian harems? You want to know who was in ’em? Christian women taken in raids. The Koran says that it’s ok to do that.
First, it is not true that no religion teaches religious tolerance. Second, the main difference between Christianity and Islam is that Jesus said to preach to the unbelievers, whereas Mohammed said to kill them.
In other words, Muslims subscribe to a double standard: one rule for Muslims and another for everyone else. More or less the opposite of the rule of law.
NO! NO! NO!
TALMUDIC JEWS, ROMANISTS & MOHAMMEDANS ARE BROTHERS IN DEATH!
THEY WILL KILL ANYONE WHO OPPOSES THEM!
THE WESTERN WORLD IS ROMANIST!
You are a whack job, Larry. Go back to playing with yourself and leave the discussion to adults.
Yes he is, he shouts loudly from his dear old grandmothers basement.
Gee, sounds a bit like Hillary Clinton!
PLEASE READ THIS… I’ve done a lot of research concerning the Muslims, socialists, communists, liberals, and this includes our dear government – Through my research – this is what I found: Please take heed to concerning the warning within concerning your children (the children of american values and spiritual outcome of those values). = = = = = = FYI: The Muslims, Communists, Socialists, and the Liberals are all working for the same thing, and they lie, cheat and steal to accomplish their goal. They are ungodly (never mind that they claim God’s name upon themselves in vain), and they are for setting up their idea of Utopia on earth (without God), and to a degree they will try to kill all that oppose them (one way or another) and have their moment of glory (here on earth) under the False Christ/THE anti-Christ, but it will be a false peace and short lived because Jesus will return to take over. That’s what this is all about (in a nutshell). Don’t take my word for it – use the internet to your benefit, and search out history which not only speaks for itself, but does repeat itself. My advice to all who believe in God and Freedom – take your children out of public school, or one day they might not come home because those little Muslim children have been trained to kill their enemy – and who is the enemy? We all know that it is those who oppose their religion. They will try to force our God out of the hearts of the people – or they will kill us. If you think that the “seemingly peace loving” Muslims won’t rise up with the terrorists, you will be sadly mistaken because they don’t want to be killed with the Christians. They won’t attack as in war with military forces as you have witnessed in times past (World War II etc., but the terror has already started – little pockets of Muslims here and there to take out those that oppose them (US soil), and the terror will grow because our very own government is supporting those (with our tax dollars) that are our very enemy. Get it together, stand up and fight for God and your fellow patriots, so that America can become free – protect your family and children because it is going to get much worse before it gets better, and remember that when seemingly peace does come, it will be a false peace brought on by the powers of satan to deceive you into their earthly utopia, and if you accept that – you give up any chance you have of having eternal life. Again, I urge you to learn as much as you can about the enemy, so you can stand against him with hope, and train your children up to resist evil. Minister MaryAnn Collins Shores-Whitley
BULL SHIT!
IF JESUS IS GOD, THEN HE HAS SAT ON HIS ARSE FOR 2000 YEARS WATCHING HIS FOLLOWERS BEING SLAUGHTERED BY ALL KINDS OF INFIDELS!
WHAT KIND OF A GOD OF LOVE IS THAT?
PUT DOWN THE COMICS & READ HISTORY!
EVEN THE HISTORY OF CHRISTENDOM IS AS BAD!
MILLIONS OF BELIEVERS WERE MURDERED BY SO-CALLED CHRISTIANS.
TAKE YOUR HEADS OUTTA YOUR ARSE & REALIZE THAT THE TEACHINGS OF THE SERMON ON THE MOUNT HAVE NEVER BEEN PRACTICED BY MAIN-LINE CHRISTENDOM.
“” FYI: The Muslims, Communists, Socialists, and the Liberals are all working for the same thing, and they lie, cheat and steal to accomplish their goal. They are ungodly…””
The hypocrisy is over the top! You forgot to mention all the other ‘religions’ like Christianity, esp Catholic Church, which have all lied from their inceptions.
And then you go on and blather about your beliefs as if they are the only right beliefs!
HOLD YOUR HORSES!
MOHAMMEDANS TRACE THEIR CULT OF DEATH BACK TO ABRAHAM.
THINK ABOUT IT?
THE 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS ARE THE CULTS OF DEATH!
READ THE TANACH, THE HISTORY OF CHRISTENDOM & MOHAMMEDANISM AND YOU ARE IN HELL!
STOP THE BS!
ALL MEMBERS OF THESE CULTS HAVE NEVER READ THEIR HISTORY!
WE MUST EXPOSE ALL 3 ABRAHAMIC CULTS OF DEATH!
Jehovah is a volcano god.
Here is the correct link for “Muslims who hurled cow dung and bags of urine at the Christians as they prayed”:
http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/archive/rotten-egg-attack-mars-indonesia-christmas-celebration/563514/
Islamic ideology is worse than Nazism, as it also promotes pedophilia, polygamy, rape, misogyny, looting, slavery and mass murder, as Mohamed did all those cremes against humanity.
Islam should be treated as Nazism and Muslims as the members of a Nazi party.
The Muslim rank-and-file are like a plague of locusts-
where ever they settle, they bring desolation and ruin.
Just mark out on a world map the violent areas of the world. Its most Muslim majority areas! Wherever, there are too Muslims, they almost always cause trouble. They are usually on their best behaviour whenever they are in the minority.
mohammed was no prophet no matter how many Christians die or how loud muslims scream murder!
The Word of God is only written in the Bible not the phony koran.
All mooslems should be sterilized at birth. Their god was a pedophile, who, when he wasn’t raping little boys and girls, would use a goat. These are the people born by apes and pigs.
The West needs to ban Islam and Muslim migration. That’s the only way to protect Western civilization, democracy and liberty and to contain terrorism.
On matters that matter to me, I couldn’t have asked for a better president than Trump. It seems he was heaven sent to fulfill my wish list including:
– leaving it to Israel to decide what’s best for Israel and then to back her.
– killing the Iran deal
– rejecting universalism and diversity in favour of nationalism
– naming the ideology as the enemy as well as countries who promote it, including Saudi Arabia
– defeating the ideology
– ending PC
– restricting immigration to people who share your values
– respecting the constitution
– protecting the first and second amendment
– working with Russia to defeat the ideology and to shut out Iran
– end funding of Hamas and Hezbollah
– government by the people for the people.
I am sure there are others.
I am not alone in sharing this wish list.
Specifically, your proposal has merit.
We have many allies who support this wish list including Breitbart, American Thinker, Front Page Mag, Center for Security Policy with Clare Lopez and Frank Gaffney Jr, to name a few.
I urge you to examine the website for the Center for Security Policy and particularly their Civilization Jihad Series.
As an example of what can be done is the formulation of the GOP platform on Israel. I know the people who had a major hand in making it happen, including Marc Zell, Joseph Sebag etc. It took years of preparation.
During the primaries, Cruz had as his advisers the Center for Security Policy, who has led the charge against defeating the ideology. Trump lagged behind in many of his current positions.
But now he has caught up. He has totally bought into this and Frank Gaffney is one of his advisers. In addition his primary adviser is Walid Phares with whom I have communicated over the years. Phares is also on my mailing list. So is Clare Lopez and many other influential people.
These are the people who will lead the fight and have the influence. Your series would simply add to their arsenal. Pipes and Lewis are yesterday’s men and no where to be found. The people I have named already form the Committee.